Laserfiche WebLink
STAFF REPORT TO BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT <br /> VARIANCE 026-86 <br /> DATE: July ?_8, 1986 <br /> ppallcant: Ra�ona Boylan <br /> 6917 Evergreen Way <br /> Everett, WA 982�3 <br /> Location of P��operty: tlorth of 3420 Bell <br /> Lots 28 & 29, 81k. 2, P:.at of Rucker <br /> ?ark . <br /> Variance Reques:eo: From E.M.C. 19.14.040, Gross Floor Area <br /> Ratio, to allow construction of a <br /> single family residenee that Would have <br /> a gross floor area ratio of .48 instead <br /> of the .30 permitted by Code. <br /> Fzisting Zoning: R-1, Single Family Low Density <br /> Resideabial <br /> Exi�ting Land Use: Vacant <br /> Ad,jacent Land Use/Zoning: ;lorth: SF/R-1 <br /> South: SF/R-1 <br /> East: SF/R-i <br /> West: SF/R-1 <br /> Exh;bits: <br /> 1. Vlcinity;Zoning Map <br /> ?, Site Plan <br /> ;. NarraLivn Statement <br /> �, Elevations <br /> FINDINGS AND COi�CLCSIONS: <br /> 1 . That thera have been exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or <br /> ecndltions apDLying to the sub�ect property or as to the intended use <br /> theroof that do nat apply generally to other properties in the same <br /> vicinity or zone. <br /> Findin�: The Applicant is proposing cons*.ruction of a single Camily <br /> resi8ence with 1 ,695 sq. ft. of llving space, 807 sq. ft. for garage <br /> and stcrage and 614 sq. ft. of finished attic for a total oC 3r1Cti <br /> sq. ft. o£ gross floor ar?a on a 6�525 sq. ft. lot for a gross floor <br /> area ratio of .48 instead of the .35 permitted by coda. <br /> The footprint of the building covars 935 s�• ft. or 14A of the lot. <br /> City zoning code defines "Gross Floor Area Ratio" as the sum of al': <br /> the floors of a building divided by the lot area. The City feels a <br /> more reasonable uay to 1191t lot cove^age wauld be to consider the <br /> tootprint of the building il3 the basis for figuring gross `loor >re:i <br /> rat�o �ince there is already a height limitation that controls tl:� <br /> num�er of floors. In the past, the gross floor area r3tio has �o� <br /> beea uniformly enforced; hoWever, the City feels tnat rather t:;ar. <br /> di�^egarding the code Lt is more appropriate to consider aoplicati.r,_ <br /> for ��ariance on an individual 5ssis untii the zoning code is changea . <br />