My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3416 BELL AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
BELL AVE
>
3416
>
3416 BELL AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/23/2017 12:24:58 PM
Creation date
1/23/2017 12:24:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
BELL AVE
Street Number
3416
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
116
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Conclusion: The variance as proposed by t1e Appiicant appears to be <br /> a reasonable request. • <br /> �. That such variance is necessary for the prese:vation and en�oysent of <br /> a substantial property right of the appeliant possessed by the owners <br /> of other properties in the sane vininity or zone. <br /> Finding: The Board of Ad�ustment has granted other requests for <br /> variance from gross floor area ratio and the City will continue to <br /> recommend doing so until the zoning code is changsd. <br /> There are othar propertias in the ���e vicinity that appear to exceed <br /> gross floor area ratio. <br /> Conclusion: The variance would alloK a property right possessed by <br /> other ownera. , <br /> 3. That the author7zation of such variance wi:.l not, be materially <br /> detrimental to tte public Welfare or in,�urio��s to property i� the <br /> vicinity or zone in which the property is located. <br /> ?indin : Since this is an area of vieW lots� there is some potential <br /> fcr view blockage; however, the t�ouse nas been designed and pLaced on <br /> the lct to minimize any potential view blockage. An agreement with <br /> the seller, who also formerlly owned the house to the south was that <br /> there be a minim� 40 foot front setback in order to minimlze view <br /> blockage. Tt'�at has been increased to a 62 foot front satbaek Wh].ch <br /> places it aven further to the rear of the house to the south. It has <br /> also been desi�ed so as to have a narrox silhouette thereby <br /> minimizing tht bulk of the strueture. <br /> Conclusion: Granting this varianee should not be aaterially <br /> detrimental to the publie wel"are or in�urious to other property. <br /> 4. That the granting of such varian�e Will n�t adversely af£ect the <br /> Com�rehenaive Goneral Plan. <br /> Findin : The Comprehensive Plan desi�ation is single family <br /> residential. <br /> Conclusion: The requested variance does not conflict wi'h tne <br /> polieies oP the Comprehensive Plan. <br /> RECOMMENDATION: <br /> pPPROVE the variance as requested by applicant Nith the folloWing conditions. <br /> 1. The appllcant obtain all necessary Building and Public Norks permit.s. <br /> Prepared by '1 . %/ � r� :, <br /> Aeviewed by ��"��� �"Q'"��`�-� <br /> Z767F <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.