3416 BELL AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import

November 9 . 1 �86 �( � �ij � � � � i� I N OV 111986 ......_ _ _. _ _..................._-- Honor abl e '! ' ' ' i am �loore UIT" OF EV[RE'I�� Catc+rcif Evnrptt P�:,::� `,1'.,..� C;;.:. Ci tr Hal ! . 300c Wetm�re E �erett , Wr1 '�8201 Dear Maror Moore . Thank you ror forwarding a copy of Mr . Cailahan s ' ? ' ter of 28 Octob�r ar�d addressed to rou to those o4 u=_ wh_� at :endeC the morn + nq maeting o4 thQ same date . While we ali thank r�u for the courtesr extend�d to �s Gr sour o�fic� , wi *h the opp�rtunitr to express oursel ��es dire•=tir to the responsible officials , a number of uf came a�ia + with thr impreasion !hat it wa.=_ a ��r� well orchQstrat�d performanca br a we1T brie e ata -- wlth the drsired results of thf ' �ertlEs? nati ��s' bein appe�se and r� tur�ed duc : ! eiy to thrr_r homes . 8� i s� his is a comotimrnt to You . Howe�Qr , man:r aues`. ir,r�s wer `, unasKEd and unansw�red in the ! imr available . i reali .e `.hat in me=_t wavs the administration' s hands were tied b> tne exi =_tiny r;nirq code , and this caused manr answers to skirt the quas! '� �=n=_ • rou exhibited lnudable moral courage in directin4 t�at =ertain aspects of thQ construction b• r wie�•�ed t� satisfr rour �wn concerns a� to whether or not the construction met *.he reauirements o4 th• zoninq code and whether or not a ' StoG Worb. order should be issued. Howev�r , Mr . hlAyor , You wQre on quite safe ground as the sam• qraund rules appliad as causa�J •.ht firs*. Stoo Work order to be lifted. What oth�r result could ther� be% Durinq th• me�tinq I asked "Why can an applicant submit tc th� City a sat of plans that Epecifically 1oca.te a structure on a ol �t of ground, and receiv• •ppr��al of that epecific plsn , and !hen physically locate that structure •lsewhere thur� prasQnt.0 and appro�ed7" I n��r rec� ived s sp�cific anawer . Th�e lst set o4 plans appro�ed br the city deplcted a set-back. e4 62 feet from th• front property lint . The exhibits. recei �ed bv the Cit>• o� E�erett Planning DQpartm�nt on Ju1r 21 , 1986 �nd use � br thQ Board of Ad,iustm�nt in its consid�rations on August 4 a1 =:� showed a set-back of 62 feet . The r�visad buildinp plans �� th a revision date oF Auqust 18 aqain d�pictad a 4ront set-back ,4 c2 feet . In that htrs. Borlan did itat• to the Board o4 Ad,luatment ^- August 4 that the exact location miqht �arr a little , shQ '�ad !wo wreks in which to ad.iust her plans prior to her submissior� 04 the r?vi $ed plana dated Auqust 18. Howe�er , again the Flana callqd for a 6e foot aet-GacK , and w�re approved on Hugust �a , t��