3416 BELL AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import

� nitial " JEF" , Plan Check "lumbor '_'•::i16?11 . It !�rou � d appa3r th;•. 3fter 3 submissions ef p' :c=_ �al ' Ino for a 62 joot set-GatV . t`: s! �his is what the applicant d�air �d , Th� Ci !r appro��e•+. Sectior = .E�4 .010 (FERh;ITS? :tetea � n Gsrt th�t "E•�er � aup � ica! ion• cor a buildiry permit shall be m:da to the bui ' �ing inzpector . . . . . . . . rhowing the actus.l sha��E and d�rt�pns : �n, e4 th� lot !e b: bu ; lt up�n , . . . . . . . and the exact locat � �n , a =e , a� 7 r,E � aht of l•he builtlinq er structure to b�+ erected . . . . . " . ""' � • Borlar� submi !ted *.hat she was ! o�_ating her hou=e exactlr �� 'eat 4rort� the 4ror ! propertr 1ine , not or.ce but threE ! me=_ , and agencies of the Citr used that sGe�= ific ir�r.ation 3 times � r� �h� - consid�rations. WI'�y did the Cit :. allow the bui ' d ' ng tc� Ge bui ' +. not at 52 fQ�t , aa approvad. but at appro= imato ' r 43 *.�� `_•d 4eat from the frant propertr line? In oaragraph 2 �f its report of its publir_ hearir�q hel ,y on August 4 , the Bosrd of Ad,;vstm�nt uged the exact words found in subparaqraph 19.70 .0�50 .A.2 �4 the -oning Code � •Jurisdictior�-Varianc�e-Conditions� . Howevar , it failed !e mantion the ' following paraqraph ii?.70 .060 .A .3> , quor,e , "That the author : zation of such variance wi11 not be material ' r dFtremental to th• public welfare �r � nJurious to VrcD�rtr in the � icini ! • �r zone in which the propertr is located. " . e�ien thc,uph !��E E'GafC� uerbalir commended Mrs . Boylan 4or her unusual consider� c _^ r* har neighbe- br G1 +� � �o her home sa far bacK on the lot to minimize tha blocking o4 our � iew. The �eaaon for th� i = �ier�a! _ommpndation wss that the Board was looKin� at the c�' =etbacr ;nown on thQ �lans presant�d to them. Tc�dar I � isited the Lountr Tar Hstasaors Offica and dete^R�� ^Q= that , under the existinq format and procedures, my pr�oert • � __ claasi4itd in t'ne 2nd hiqhest classi4icxtion undgr the cate�or . ":!IEW" . A3 !he � iew ob� iouslr has been sariou=_! > dQgraded, `.he cl �ssiiicatlon most prob�.bty will drop ta th�e 4th clnssl4ica.! : on , the lowest . Usinq th• •xisting computations � n *.hat deca.rtmen+. , this low�rinq o4 th• VIEW classificstion would drop m. �Pursised �i�lu• about si3,eee .00 . How can this not be " injur : �us " �or resale purposes? A1so, wh�t hepFened to m� " subst�nt � e '. pro��e� ! + riqht" H�w could the the Board o4 Ad.iustment consider that 4rant � nq the �ariance would not b• " in,iuriour." to my pr�perty? This conclusion coul � onlr ha�e b��n reached br conBid�ration o4 tha •�c 4oct .?t- back present�ed to the Board and displared on the screen duriny !he he�rinq. If the recorder was turnFd �n �uring the �nt � re `.ear � ^g, this consideration should b• ��rifiab? f . I undfrctand •.hat th• next propvrtr appra� sals w � 11 occur a! `.^r end c4 this c�lendar :�esr. The m<itters to which I request specific answers are : 1 ) Wh+ did the Citr at ? ow t`�e building to be CC'11� �' U� rEC �,= � � .