6107 BERKSHIRE DR 2018-01-02 MF Import

5. Compatibility of proposed structures and improvements with surrounding properties, including the size, height, location, setback and arrangement of all prolrised buildings and facilities, especially as they relate to light and shadow impacts on more sensitive land uses and IesF intensil e zones. Findings: The new antennas will be mounted onto an existing pole structure. Conclusions: The proposal is not anticipated to have adverse impacts on the surrouneing properties. 6. The number, size and location of signs, especially as they relate to more sensitive Land uses. Findings: No signage is proposed Conclusions: Not applicable. 7. The landscaping, buffering and screening of buildings, parking, loading and storage areas, especially as they relate to more sensitive land uses. Findings- Screening provision! were required for the installation of the existing pole. No additional screening will b-- necessary for his proposal. All existing landscaping and screening will rernam unchanged. Conclusions: Not applicable. S. The generation of nuisance irritants such as noise, smoke, dust:, odor, glare, visual blight or other undesirable impacts. Findings: The proposed facility is unmanned and is not anticipated to emit any known health hazards. Conclusions: No noise, smoke, dust, odor, glare, visual blight or other undesirable impacts :are anticipated as a result of the proposal. 9. Consistency with the goals and policies of the Everett General Plan for the area and land use designation in which the property is located. Findings: The site is designated 2.8 Public Facilities on the City of Everett's General Plan map. Conclusions: The proposed use does not conflict with the General Plan. 10. Compliance with the provisions of this Ordinanct and other City, State and Federal regulations. Findings: All necessary building and associated permits must be obtained for the proposal prior to construction. Conclusions: The proposal will comply with the provisions of the City's Zoning Code and the applicant must obtain any required State and/or Federal permits. 11. Accessibility to public transit, and traffic reduction measures proposed by the applicant to reduce dependence of the proposed use on the automobile. Findings: The facility is unmanned. Conclusion: Not applicable.