Laserfiche WebLink
.,. - - - i <br /> i <br /> . , ; <br /> � I <br /> . , <br /> i <br /> ], review the Building It�spector's decision, held on June 6, 1977, I <br /> i <br /> 2 the Board of Adjustment heard unsworn statements from various I <br /> 3 persons, as well as argument from the attorney representing the I <br /> ¢ defendants, Larson, azid did then and there make a <br /> determination � <br /> 5 to reverse the Building, Inspector`s decision, finding that the � <br /> 6 plain`iffs were utilizing their residence in violation of the <br /> 7 City of' Everett Zoning Code. <br /> 8 Thereafter, plaintiffs requested that the Board reconsider I <br /> 9 the dete:cmination on the appeal of Robert Larson and the Board � 1 <br /> 10 scheduled a meeting for June 30, 1977, for the purpose of finaliz- i / <br /> 11 ing Findings � Conclusions on said a ' <br /> Ppeal and to make a determina- I � <br /> 12 tion on plaintiffs' request for reconsideration. A co I � <br /> 13 notice dated June 2p PY of the � <br /> ' . 1977, concerning said meeting is attached J, <br /> 14 hereto as Exhibit "9" and by this reference incorporated herein. <br /> 15 At the meeting held on June 30, 1977, plaintiffs, through their <br /> 16 attorney, were allowed to �rgue their case, nevertheless, the <br /> 17 Board voted to aff.irm its earlier decision and, thereafter, on <br /> 18 July 11, 1977, entcred its formal "Findings & Conclusions In <br /> 19 �ppeal I'rom Determination of Buildin <br /> 20 9 Insper_tor/Official, " a <br /> copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "5" and incorporated <br /> 21 herein b <br /> y this reference. Said Findings & Conclusions stated, in <br /> 22 part, tlie following: <br /> � 2S On the basis of <br /> the Board of AdjustmentVherebylreverse�snthesions, <br /> �4 Findin s & <br /> 4 Conclusions of tlie Building ]nspector/ <br /> 25 Official and finds that the past uses or 115 <br /> Bridgeway have imparted a commercial incidence <br /> 26 to that property in violation of the perr.missible <br /> uses in an R-1 Zone as stated in the Everett <br /> 27 Municipal Code Zoning provisions. <br /> 28 It is from this decision of the Board that plaintiffs <br /> 29 herein appeal. <br /> 30 C• ASSIGNMENTS O_ F Egftpg; <br /> 31 1• Defendant Larson lacks standin to a eal the <br /> 32 Building Insoector's decision. <br /> NOTICE OF Appgpr, _3 " <br /> GDF:st <br /> ANDEpBON,NUNTEp,DCWEIL•O�KER 0 WLLIN9,p.& <br /> �����H�T MATIOH�I,p�NK OIIILOiMO <br /> ���T'�� WASHINGTON o0Z01 <br /> .� T[tcvNONs f2oe1 352.DIo1 <br />! � <br /> y I <br /> F <br /> I� j�. . .�_ _ <br />