My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2531 BROADWAY 2016-01-01 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
BROADWAY
>
2531
>
2531 BROADWAY 2016-01-01 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/28/2017 12:23:46 PM
Creation date
1/24/2017 2:11:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
BROADWAY
Street Number
2531
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
203
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� <br />-6- S- 3' 7� <br />r � J �/ � <br />�. s _J,^ <br />i <br />(48j rather than the required one-hundred-eighteen (118). .� <br />Legal DescY•iption: Block 567, Lots 11 - 12 inclu�i.ve Plat <br />of Everett <br />luidress: �531 Broadway <br />2oning: C-1, General Commercial <br />Jeanne Dixon, a real estate broker from Bellevue, represented <br />Consolidated Dairy Products and made the folluwing statements: <br />1. <br />� <br />3. <br />The Darigold Company is consolidating their business and <br />have no further use for the building. <br />Additional.purchase of property for parking would be costly. <br />However, additional parking is possible by lease. <br />The building has historic value and will remain the same <br />other than internal improvements. <br />9. Fifty percent of the property is in parking.now. <br />Mr. John Collins also spoke in behalf of Consolidated Dairy <br />Products request and added the following: ' <br />1. The propos�d use of the building would be primarily for a <br />restaurant. <br />2. There are sevcral restaurants uptown and in other areas of <br />the City that are providing less parking then is being <br />asked of Cof�solidatea. <br />3. Mr. Collins had spoken to the owner of the drive-in to the <br />north and to acquire property for parking in that area <br />would be costly. <br />4. With proper planning, on the area that is availabl.�, a mini- <br />mum of sixty-six (66) parking spaces could be i�rovided rather <br />than the forty eight (48) as shown on the appiication. <br />Mr. Sill Tackett and Mr. Larry Foster, restaurant owners, were <br />against the granting of the variance for the following reasons: <br />1. All parking requirements had to be met on their buildings <br />so no partiality sl�ould be shown to Consolidated. The same <br />rules should apply for al.l. <br />2. The reduction from 118 to 98 parking stalls is n�re than <br />fifty (50) percent less parking than the Ordinance requires. <br />This is too much to ask for. ' <br />There was no further comments from the audience. <br />T� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.