Laserfiche WebLink
� <br /> r <br /> Mr. Curt Beattie <br /> September 2, 1982 <br /> Page 2 <br /> _ w�, <br /> 9. Masonry bearing and shear stress has been recalculated based on the <br /> reduced width as shown on Detail 6/S-9, 7/S-9, and 12/5-9, and found <br /> structurally adequate. See attached calculations. <br /> 10. Bond beam steel as shown on Column Details 17/S-9, 22/S-9 have to be <br /> revised and anchored inside the column similar to Column Detail 20/S-9. <br /> 11 . Sections 17%5-10 and 23/5-10 have to be revised (reversed) corresponding <br /> to the locations shown on sheet S-4, and so as remarks on Beam Schedule, <br /> sheet S-8 reference 23/5-10 instead of 17/5-10. <br /> I hope that the above is satisfactory. Please contact me immediately if there i <br /> are any questions or additional insufficiencies. I <br /> Very truly yours, I <br /> ��' ���' , <br /> ames Chen, P.E. <br /> Structural E�gineering Divisior� � <br /> � <br /> JC/bh I <br /> Enclosures (Copy of Design Calculations) � <br /> cc: L. N. Callahan, Building Director � <br /> Lester Gillis, P.E. - IC60 Region�7 Manager <br /> David Thomas, P.E. - KPFF <br /> 81757 <br /> J <br /> � <br /> �. —� <br /> � _. <br /> J <br />