4504 BROADWAY 2018-01-02 MF Import

�\ V . L/ the Appellant. 5. The conditions recommended by the Planning Department were as follows: a. The site must be developed in a manner consistent with the site plan presented at the public hearing. b. The Applicant must comply saith all conditions listed in the Determination of Non-Significance for the proposal. 6. After hearing the public testimony at the public hearing on June 28 , 1988, the City Council made the followinq findinqs: a. That the use of other crematoriums by Everqreen Funeral Home may be cancelled in the future. b. That the exclusion of the applicant's crematorium may be discriminatory. c. That the existence of other crematorium services in the City, by qranting the permit will assure that said services may be more competitive. d. Thnt families of deceased persona may be more comfortable with crematorium services available at the funeral home where • they have brouqht their loved ones. CONCLUSIOIIs 1. Evergreen Funeral Home submitted a request for the construction of a crematoriwa on their existing funeral home and cemetery site. Pursuant to the provisions of E![C 19.58.O10.C.2, a Special property Use Permit is required for the propoanl. 2. The appeal is an appeal of the Hearinq Examinsr's decision which denied the Special Prcperty Use Permit. Tha Heerinq Examiner concluded tha�t the Applicant could meet the criteria of compatibility and environmental impact, but did not show that the use would �eat the public need criteria. 7. At the public henring on June 28, 1988, the City Council found that the crematorium will serve the public convenience and necessity. DBCISION ' The City Council reverses the Hearing Examiner's Conclusion N6 , reverses the Hearinq Examiner's decision, and direct:; approval of SFU N2-88 subject to the condition� recommended by the Planning Department, which are as follows: 1. The site must be devEloped in a manner consistenl• with the site F_Xh'IB�T �: