5825 BROADWAY 2016-01-01 MF Import

; I � ii 3. Thcre are no reasonable alternatives which wou2d allow for accep[able deaign of the ahort subdivlsion in accordance with existing standards. a. Finding: City street standards would require a 40' right-o:- way, 24' pavement. b. Conclusion: Easement acceas is the most acceptable design to the City. 4. The applicant's request for a short subdivision has been proceRsed by. the City which confirms that the final approval canno[ be granted vithout an authorized variation from the Board. a. Finding: The applicant hae filed a ahart subdivieion vith the City. b. Conclusion: The short subdivision has been granted preliminary approval. 5. Furthermore, when granting a variation to allow easement access to any ' lot, the Board ahall determine that: common easement serving one (1; lot shall have a width of not less than 20'; method and responsibility ' for maintenance ch�ll be established; there must be one (1) lut fronting on a stre2t for each lot served by an easement; and the, compu[ation of lot sizes for rear lots ehall not use the easement. i j a. Finding: The easement is 20' wide with one (1) lot fronting on � Mukil[ea Boulevard and one (1) lot with zero (0) frontage. All � lo[s meet zoning requirements for lo[ area. I - b. Concluaien: All conditions of 18.44.210(0) have been met• I RECOMMENDATION: APPROVE Approve an easement access as requeated by the applicant vith the following conditione: 1. The easement is only effective when final approval has been granted to Short Subdivisicn 111-85. All conditions of that ehort subdivision must be met. 2. The effective easement width shall not be lesa than 20'. I 3. The applicant muet provide an easement document that is accentable to the City setting forth the method and responsibility for matntenance of easement accesa area providing perpetual accesa to all lote in the ahort plat. This easement muet be a non-exclusive easement. -2-