Laserfiche WebLink
, <br />�� <br />� <br />J-736-02 <br />Page 3 <br />The suitability of various soils for placement as structurat <br />fill depends largely on the fines content (soil finer than the <br />No. 20U mesh sieve) and the .noisture cont�:nt �t the timc of <br />placement. This was discusse�i further in our December 20, 1978 <br />report (see pages 8 through 11). If fill is to be placed during <br />wet weather months, we recou�enc'. importing a clean, well-graded <br />sand and gravel for use as structural fill. <br />Consideration of East Wall Footing <br />We understand the east wall line is planned to be located 15 <br />feet west of the east propertp line and that the site grade is <br />presontly about 10 feet in e]evation abcve the adjacent east <br />proper`y. This would allow for a recou�eRded fill slope of 1.5 <br />H:1V trom t.op af slab to the ground at the property. However, <br />this situation woul.d require extending the f.00ting at least <br />some 3 to 4 feet below top of slab. We reco��end that the footing <br />baFe be extended below the plane of a 2H:1V s;ope projected from <br />the outside bottom edge of r,he footing to the East property line. <br />In addition, a minimum k foot horizontal distanc� should be <br />maintained between the bottom edge of the footing and the 1.5H: <br />1V f.ill slope to allow for adequate soil cover against the footing. <br />We wi11 include a detail depicting these recou�endati.�n's in our <br />forthc��ming report. <br />Drainage Considerationa <br />Because of the nature of L-he fill soils, drainage of svrface water <br />by infiltratian would be very slow. In our opinion, a w=11 <br />desi�ned storm water system with catch basins in lower elevation <br />areae would adequately handle surface runoff. We further recoun.�end <br />that the exterior ground surface adjacent to the planned stx��ctuie <br />be adequately sloped away from the building so that ponding of. <br />water does not occur. <br />Recotmoendations for Addi.tional Services <br />We recor�end Hart-Crowser f. Asaociates, Inc. be provided the <br />opportunity for a general review of final design and specifications. <br />It is also recot�nended that we be rctained to provide continuing <br />geotechnic9l engineering services �iuring the aite preparation and <br />faundation excavation phases of this work. This is to observe <br />compliance with the design concepta, specificatione or reco�ends- <br />tions and to allow design changes in the event that sc�bsurface <br />conditions differ from that anticipaCed prior to start of <br />conetruction. � <br />