Laserfiche WebLink
' ( i <br /> Conclusion: Undergrounding of the anlennas is inconsislent with the technological neecls of wireless <br /> communica!ion facilities. <br /> 6. Abo��e ground and communlcations facilities shall be designed so as tu be �uWest heig6t <br /> possible to adequatcly serve the needs of the public for the proposed utility or communicstion <br /> service The review authority, in considering the proposed udlity or communkrtion faciBty, <br /> may allow antenna or tower heighl to exceed the height petmitted in thc underlying zone <br /> without having to saUsfy t6e variance approval criteria of Section 41.130.0 of this title. <br /> Approval may unly be granted if it csn be demonstrated that suc6 heig6t is necessary tu <br /> adequately serve the needs of the public for the proposed ulility or communications service. <br /> T6e applicanl ahall provlde an evaluation of altemative designs and locations w6k6 rnuld result <br /> in a lower tower or entenna height. <br /> Findines: The anlennas will meet the 50-foot height limitation in the C-1 zone. The height of the <br /> antennas are a► the lowest height possible because of other buildings, trees and irregular topography <br /> in the area and the line of sight requirements for signal transmission. <br /> Conclusion: The applicant dces not need to submit an alternative design or location analysis. <br /> 7. Towers associated with above grouod uUllty end communicslions facilitiea and ell ancillary <br /> structures shall cort; �y with the sMback atandards of the zooe io whic6 the property is located; <br /> provlded t6at when allowed to be localed in or wilhln 200 feet of residentiel zones, the heig6t of <br /> the tower shall not exceed the horizontal disyance between the base of the tower and the nearest <br /> residentfal property line. The review authority, in considedng the proposed utitlty or <br /> communicatfons facility, may allow a lesser sMback, without having to satisfy the variance <br /> approval criterla of Section 41.130.0 of lhis tltle, If it can be demonstrated that a lesser setback <br /> is necessary lo adequatrly serve the needs of the public for the proposed utility or <br /> communlcalions service, or that a lesser setback wlll result in better screeeing theo in a location <br /> which meets the setbacks required herein. <br /> Findines: Sctbacks and height of the equipment building have been addressed under A�5 of the <br /> general evaluztion and revie�v criteria. <br /> Conclusion: Selback and height requirements will be met by the equipment buildi�g. <br /> 8. The above ground utillty or communication facllity shall be removed from t5e site should the <br /> use for such purposes be dlsconlinued for 120 days of more. <br /> Findines: This requirement will be a condition of approval. <br /> Conclusion: Verizon Wireless must remove the facility if use of the site is discontinued for 120 days <br /> or more. <br /> 9. Maintenance, repalr, or replacement of exisling utility or communlcations facil(ties or <br /> appurtenant structures and lha installation of minor above ground utility and rntnmunlcatfoas <br /> facllities are exempt from thls section. Thls eaeemptton indudes replecement or increased heights <br /> of nut more Ihan 20 feet to accommodate wireless telecommunfcations antennas. <br /> Findines: This section is not applicable. <br /> Conclusion: This proposal is not exempt from this section. <br /> �(o <br />