Laserfiche WebLink
� <br /> existing or rcpl�cement lowers ��r structures shall bc preferred unless the propoeent cen <br /> demonstrate t6at n new structure is necessary ro adequatcly serve the needs of t6e public. I; <br /> When proposed to be locnted on an existing or replacement tower or structure located in a <br /> nonresidential zone localed at lenst 300 feet fcom resideotiel zones, facilities which are subject to <br /> Review Process II shall be reviewed usin� Review Process 1, subject to meettng all requirements <br /> of Ihis sectimi. Wlien proposed to bc locatcd on an existing or replacement �utiltty or <br /> communication stniclure or other nonresidential :�tn�cture in a residential zone, Review Pmcess <br /> 11 shall be required. <br /> Findinas: Up ro eight antenna: will be placed on an cxisting building, thus eliminating the necd to <br /> build a new cellular communications tower or monopole. Thc Use Tab�e of the zoning code, Chapter ( <br /> 5, mquires Rcview Process 11. However, the proposal is a minimum c�f 300 feet from all residential <br /> zane�. Therefore, Review Proccss I is required. <br /> Conclusion: Thi< pro�x�sal dces not pmliferate towers or monopotes. Review Process 1 applies to i <br /> this pruposal. ' <br /> 3. Tower structures for alwve ground utillly and /or communications facilities shall not be <br /> locatcd in or within 300 fcel of residentially zoned ereas. in or within 200 fcel uf gatewey <br /> corridors as designated by the Everett compre6ensive plan, or in or within 200 feet of ereas <br /> under the jurlsdiction of the shoreline mnsler proQram, unlcss the appllcant provides an <br /> analysis of alteroative sites and existing facilities which are technically feusible w6ether the <br /> structure could be located or co-located which demoostrates that t6e proposed facility cannot <br /> adequately serve the needs of the public for the proposed utility or rnmmunications service in an <br /> alternative locetion. Use of existing or replecement utility and communicaHons facilfUes is <br /> encouraged. When existing fncilities are used or replaced, addilion lo or replacement of <br /> existing structures mey exceed thc height of the exisling facility by not n�ore than 201'cet. <br /> Pindinss: No towcr structures are proposed. <br /> Conclusion: No analysis of alternative sires is reyuired. <br /> 4. When lower stractures for alwve ground utility and/or communications facilities are <br /> proposed to be located withtn 300 feel of residentially zoned area�, in or wilhin 200 feet of <br /> gateway sorridors as designated bv the Evcrett comprehcnsive plan, or in or within 200 fee of <br /> arcas under the jurisdiction of the s6oreline master progrem, zones whic6 otherwise require <br /> Review Process II shall use Review Process Ill. <br /> Pindines: 5ee criteria N2. <br /> Cunclusion: This critcria dces not appty. <br /> S. All u��ility and communfcation facilitfes shall be installed undergrouod or wlthin structures to <br /> lhe greatest exlent practicsl in order to maximize safety and mluitnlze visual and noise impocts <br /> upon surrounding propertics. When it is nol practical to install underground or within <br /> structures, all utility and communications facililies s6a11 be architecturally desigaed aod <br /> screened so as to minimize visual impacts on and promote compatibility with surrounding <br /> properties. <br /> Pindine�: Due to the "line of sight" nature of radio frequency transmissions, it is not practical or <br /> technically feasible to underground an antenna. All support equipment will be located on-grade <br /> within an equipment building. <br /> !G <br />