Laserfiche WebLink
CITY OF EVERETT <br /> PLANNING 6 COlQdUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPIIRTMENT <br /> PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REVIEW <br /> June 30, 1990 <br /> p '7� aJ0 <br /> PART I <br /> INTRODUCTION: The City of Everett Planninq Department hae <br /> received an application by the Snohomish County Public <br /> Utility District No. 1 to enlarge en exietinq Boeinq <br /> substetion just to the west of 20th 1lvenue West. The site is <br /> located in the M-2 zone, Heavy Manufacturinq. In this zone, <br /> above qround utility facilities are required to be reviewed <br /> under Review Process IIB usinq the general criteria from <br /> Section 41.150.0 of the City of Everett 2oning Code. <br /> BACKGROUNO: The Boeing Substation is a 200 by 180 foot <br /> fencad fecility thet provides electric service to the 747/767 <br /> plant. A 40 by 60 foot fencad eren will be edded to the <br /> southwest cor.ner of the substation. A 16 by 24 foot metel <br /> control huilding, 12 feet in height, will be loceted in the <br /> expanded portian of tha substetion and will include e 20 foot <br /> drive throuqh gi�te. �►ccesa to this gate requires culverting <br /> an exisl:inq stt-eem that drnina surrounding woods on the <br /> Boeing property to an existinq sump. <br /> section 41.150.0 of the Zoning Code requires that the <br /> proposal be evelueted from the followinq general criteria: <br /> 1. The need of the neighborhood, district or City Por a <br /> proposed special property use. <br /> 2. The edequacy of streets, utilities, end public services <br /> required to serve a proposed use. <br /> 3. The impecL• of traffic qenerated by the proposed use on <br /> the surrounding aree, pedestrian circulation and public <br /> Rafety; and the ability of the proponent to mitigate such <br /> potential impacts. <br /> 4. The provision of adequnte off-etreet perking, on-site <br /> circulation, end site acc�iss. <br /> 5. Competibility of proposed structures and improvements <br /> with surroundinq properties, includinq the aize, heiqht, <br /> location, setback and arrangement oP all proposed buildinqs <br /> and facilitiea, especially as they relete to liqht and sl�adow <br /> impects on more senaitive land uses and less intansive zones. <br />