605 W CASINO RD 2016-01-01 MF Import

� The applicant should provide at least six off street parking spaces in the rear r yard area for Lot A given the fact, that tlie single fami:y dwelling in this location is not viable use. The apolicant needs to provi�e additional lot area so that there is the option for conversion to R-3 uses such as medical clinics, duplexes, tri-plexes and four-plexes. The required addition of lot area for parking on Lot A will reduce the parking area on Lot 6. .? C. Alternatives Finding: The site could be developed as a single parcel with the complete demolition or removal of the existing house. The applicant does not feel this is a reasonable alternative. The rea�onable option is to leave enough lot area on Lot A for conversion to R-3 uses. Conclusion: This Short Subdivision could not be developed under the current standard except through the use of the easement access option without complete demolition, or removal of the existing single family home. D. Fin.:l AnProval Finding: This Short Subdivision could not be approved unless a Variance is granted by the 6oard. Conclusion: No preliminary approval has been granted at this time. DECISION: APPROV� Approve a Variance to allow easement access to Lot B as provided in Sec. 18.44.210 E.M.C. with the following conditions: l. The easement is effective only after linal approval has been granted on Short Subdivision //18-83, which will show a expanded lot area to provide additional parking for Lot A. 2. The eifective ease ment width for service to Lot B shall be not less than 20 feet. 3. Both Lots A and B must use the same driveway entrance off of Casino Road adjacent to the west property line. 4. The Applicant must provide an easement document that is acceptable to the City setting forth the method and responsibllity for maintenance of the easement access area, providing perpetual access to all lots subject to Short Subdivision �118-33. This must be a non-exclusive easement for access and utilities. L L _ z -