Laserfiche WebLink
� . <br /> 5farch 9 , 1974 (cont'd) <br /> � After viewing the subject property and considering all the facts <br /> and testimony, it was moved by Mr. Derg, seconded by Mr. Ingram <br /> and unanimously carried to grznt the applicant' s request for the <br /> following reasons : <br /> 1 - The granting of the variance is necessary for the appli- <br /> cant's enjoyment of his property rights. <br /> 2 - Granting the variance cvill not be detrimental to the <br /> surrounding area. <br /> 3 - There are exceptional circumstances which apply to the <br /> subjec� property that do not apply generally to other <br /> oroperties in the vicinity. <br /> 4 - �ranting the variance will not be injurious to the General <br /> Comprehensive Plan. <br /> A hearing was held on the application of Herb Norgaard, 9� r_Pn Ar <br /> Place . Everett for a variance from Sec. 15.04 .050 E.C.C. (Zoning <br /> Code) General Provisions - Land Use for permission to divide a <br /> tract into two (2) parcels that will not aUut for a minimum of <br /> 40 feet on a public dedicated street. ALSO: For a variance from <br /> � ( Sec. 15. 04. 075 E.C.C. (Zoning Code) R-S, Suburban Residential <br /> � Zone for permission to divide the aforementioned lot into two (2) <br /> parcels of land containing 10,605 sq. ft. Existing zoning pro- <br /> � visions require that said parcels abut for a minimum of 40 ft. ' <br /> i� on a public dedicated streeY. and have a minimum of 12 ,500 sq. ft. <br /> of land area. R-S Suburban Residential 2one. Lot 7 and Lot 8 less N 70ft., <br /> ( B1 >ck 9 , Shore Acres Addition. 5029 Sound Avenue (approximately) . <br /> IMr. Noryaard added that through the advice of his engineer, he I <br /> would use Alki Drive, which is located on the N.E. corner of Lot 7 , <br /> as a private driveway. So Alki Drive would become a gravelled <br /> private driveway from its origination to Lot 7. The access to <br /> � the other two parcels of property would be from Sound Avenue. <br /> � A number of the neighbors were against Mr. Norgaard' s request <br /> ; for the following reasons : <br /> � <br /> i 1 - There would be too many small divisions of the pruperty, <br /> I which is contrary to the continuity of the area. <br /> 2 - There is some question as to the road usage, particularly <br /> on the private roadway. <br /> � <br /> �� 3 - Drainage and water is a problem now; this would increase <br /> the problem. <br /> r � <br /> _5_ <br />