Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br /> � <br /> hlarch 4 , 1974 (cont'd) � <br /> �,;;� 4 - The property is too steep for two (2) homesites. However, <br /> there is no objection to one single family dwelling being <br /> constructed. <br /> 5 - There would be a loss of view for adjacent property owners. <br /> After visually viewing the subject property and considering all the <br /> facts and testimony, it was moved by Mr. Baird, seconded by Mr. <br /> Ingram, and unanimously carried to deny the applicant' s request <br /> for the following reasons : <br /> � 1 - The lots would be of insufficient size for three (3) <br /> houses. <br /> 2 - The lots would be inconsistent with the character of the <br /> area. <br /> 3 - Ingress and egress to both lots has not been clearly <br /> defined. <br /> 4 - The splitting of the lots would adversely effect the <br /> Comprehensive Land Use Plan. <br /> On motion, the meeting adjourned at 9 : 35 p.m. <br /> I <br /> . <br /> Reid H. Shockey, Sec etary <br /> Board �E Adjustment <br /> � <br /> -6- <br />