1333 CHESTNUT ST 2016-01-01 MF Import

( c � In addition if the lots are developed with a non-residential commercial structure or a residential structure oi five or more units then full standard half sireet improvements are required to Chestnut Street, including but not limited to curb, gutter, sidewalks, slreet widening and drainage control per City Design Standards. Conclusion: Adequate provisions for access, utilities and public services for the proposal can be accommodated subject to the above conditions. 3. The impact of trafflc generated by the proposed use on the surrounding area, pedestrian cl�culation and public safety; and the abllity of the proponent to mitigate such potential Impacts. Findfng: The proposed addition of four new single-family residences will add to the averege daily trips in the area. The City of Everett Publfc Services Department has required that the alley be paved to City standards. Conclusion: No adverse impacts to traffic are anticipated as a result of the proposal. 4. The provis(on of adequate off-street parking, on-site circulatlon, and site access. Finding: A minimum of 2 off street parking spaces is required for each of the single-family residences. Access to the lots will be directly oK of the alley. Conclusion: Off street parking, on site circulatlon, and site access will be adequate. 5. Compatibility of proposed structures and Improvementa with aunounding propertles, includfng the slze, height, location, setback and arrangement of all proposed buildings and tacilitlea, especially as they relate to Ilght and shadow impacts on more sensitive land uses and leas intensive zones. Finding: The proposal is to construct four single-family residences. The surcounding area is developed with residential, commercial, and industrial uses. Since the lots are less than 5,000 square feel in area, the single-family residence must comply with the Small Lot Development Standards as established in Section 7 of the City oi Everett Zoning Code. Conclusion: The proposed residential use of the property fs compatible with existing developments in the area. 6. The �umber, size and locatlon of signs, especlally as they relate to more sensitive land uses. Finding: No signage is proposed for the dwellings other than address identification. Conclusion: Signage for the site is regulated under Sectlon 36 oi the Everett Zoning Code. 7. The landscaping, buHering and screening of bulldfngs, parking, loading and storage areas, especially as they relate to mors sensitive land uses. /�{