Laserfiche WebLink
BOEING COMMERCIAL AIRPLANE COMPANY <br /> EVERETT FACILITY <br /> BUILDING 40-26 <br /> EVERETT, WASHINGTON <br /> STRUCTURAL PEER REVIEW COMMENTS ON <br /> 90% CONCRETE FOUNDATION SUBMITTAL <br /> MARCH 23, 1992 <br /> Note: Comments on Structural Steel Design, comment numbers 1 through 36, <br /> were aent on March 13, 1992. <br /> 37 - Sheet TNS16. It seems Section 8/TNS507 should be cut through the <br /> tunnel iloor constructlon joint. <br /> Section B/TNS507 is moved to tunnel floor cunstruction joint, Issue "A" 3-30-92. <br /> 38 - Detells 5/S288, 4/S289, 5/S289 and 7/S289. 1'he slzes of the steel ba�e <br /> plates do not appear to be completely called nut. <br /> Steel Base Plate sizes are called out on Details �/S288, 4/S289, 5/S289 and <br /> 7/S289, Issue "B" 3-30•92. <br /> 39 - Deteil 9/S290. It seems the overall vertical dimenslon of the pler should <br /> be 7' - 0". <br /> Overall dimension has been revised to 7'-0", Issue "B" 3-30-92. <br /> 40 - Sheet 1S503. <br /> a. Section C/1S506 is called out tor the slab on grade/track beam )oint <br /> on Line 1. This section, however, shows dowels to a tunnel roof <br /> slab. Are dowels to the track beam desired? <br /> Section C/1S506 (taken from 1S500 and iS503) has callout "TYP" <br /> changed to "SIM". (Similer), and construction joint does not have dowel <br /> marks shown, Issue "B" 3-3G-92. <br /> 1 <br />