Laserfiche WebLink
Degenkolb -- - <br /> Page 7'wo <br /> April 14, 1992 � <br /> On April 10, 1992, we receiveci, via facsimile, written responses to our 9096 review <br /> commenta on the concrete design and written responses to our April 7, 1992, <br /> commenb on the atrv�tural steel design. On April 13, 1992, we received the orlginaLs <br /> of these documents wfth assoclated calculetione and drawings. The responaes <br /> contalned in documents received responded adequately to all of our outstandfng <br /> comments except for one regarding the bracing of wind columns by the fixed spur rail <br /> beams, as discussed in our Aprll 13, ]992 letter. _ <br /> The Austin Company has responded to al] o( our peer review comments In a <br /> satLsfactory menner except for one. It is our opinion that the structvral design of _ <br /> Bullding 40-26 la in general conformance with the ]988 EdiHon of the Unlform <br /> Bulldtng Code pendtng the satlsfactory resolution of the one outstanding comment. <br /> Please call if there are any questions. It has been our pleasure to provide this <br /> independent peer review of your design. <br /> Very truly yours, <br /> H. J. DEGENKOL9 ASSOCIATES, E[VGWEERS <br /> , � ��� � <br /> Lodng A. Wy ,JIli� r. Thomas D. Wosser <br /> - - I <br /> uwiw�wa <br /> P:\prefn.ft V IovO/rep ' <br /> I <br /> . ' ,-:..�_;� <br /> rrll• IUR �•IL.O. Ir.O❑ �u ,�l �fn <br /> rnnF�T '�ncc�� a�m�a�xin i <br /> I <br />