Laserfiche WebLink
routed to the oil/water separator. Normal precipitation <br /> generated runoff would pass through the valve and out to the <br /> Japanese Gulch atorm systam. This option would only be <br /> feasible if runoff from the slab was normally coneidered <br /> clean, with neqligible quantities of oil or other petroleum <br /> derived fluids. (This situation may be a no-winnar for <br /> Boeing - if the runoff is normally expected to carry <br /> measurable quantities of oils, then this runoff should also <br /> be routed throuqh an oil/water separator before it�s <br /> discharqed to the swale/wetpond eystem downstream. ) <br /> With respect to the hydrology of the site's wetlands, <br /> Boeinq's engineers will be puttinq together a packet of <br /> information for review by Steve Stanley of Planninq. They <br /> will datermine approximately how much flow from this 3ite is <br /> currently enterinq the wetlands and attempt to mimi� these <br /> flows after development with roof top runoff. Isaues that <br /> may come up include how routing these flows di:ectly to the <br /> wetlands relates to Boeing's allowable release rates to <br /> Japanese Creek and its trfbutaries. If the proposed flows <br /> to be released to the wetlands are low enough, such that a <br /> good portion of the flow would be expected to infiltrate <br /> before reaching the main creek channel, there may be no <br /> cause for concern. <br />