3003 W CASINO RD BLDG 40-85 2018-01-01 MF Import

. , � • I � i �i ,-c�ilat.ed the same for comments which were due Apr.i.l 26, 1978 . 2 I This draft PIS �vas not sent to the City oE Seattle or Kin9 County 3 Prior to April 7.G , 197P a numher of. public aqenries, Q � community orqanizations and cil-izens submitted suhstantial $ wri tten commenL-s. Appe] IanYs �aere amonq qr.��ups submittin�7 com- 6 ments. The comments outlined areas of deficiency in the draft 7 EIS, including the fact that neither the impact on low-income $ housing no.r the housing impact in King County had been addressed 9 at all . 10 Ry letter of May 8 , 1978, Appellants via t;ieir 11 counsel, P•.verqreen Legal Services, requested that the new draft 12 concerning the impact on low-income housing and the impact on 13 King County housing be circulated for comment pursuant to regu- 14 lation, and that the draft EIS be circulated to the City of 15 Seattle and King County pursuant to regulation. Ay letter of 15 D9ay 10 , 1978 Appellants ' counsel asked that certain mitigating 17 measures be addressed. By letter of May 11, 1978, the respon- 18 sible official denied these requests and on the same day issued 19 I the final EIS. LU I The final �IS having been issued by the City of li 21 i� Cverett, no further comments or appeals are available short of 22 I this appea: . IIut for this appeal, the buildinq o�ficial would be 23 I free to issue the building permit on May 19, 1978, ho�aever such 24 issuance would be without leyal authority inasmuch as the final 25 EIS is inadequate . 26 j rv. 27 ASSIGNDI6NT OI' I:RRORS Z$ I - — ; A. The lead agency (City of Everett Planning 29 II � Department) failed to comply with the provisions of l9AC 197-10- I 30 495 by refusing to re-circulate for puUlic commant si9nificant 31 new infoi-m��tion, to wit: thosc sections of the I;IS which address 32 i tiOTICC Ol' APPI:AL -3- i