3003 W CASINO RD BLDG 40-85 2018-01-01 MF Import

. . � � I I � � i � i th� proposal ' s impact on low-incom� hou�inn in Snoh�mish County 2 and hr�usinq and lo�,�-income houcinq on the a£fected areas of t:ing 3 II County, which siqnificant n�c. information cur.cerned anticihal.ed, 4 II environmrntal impact�, and which information w�s m,de av�ilable 5 �, by the ��nn.^,or subsequent to circu] ation nf �he initial draft i 6 GZS. Circul3ti�n of a new draft GIS is necessary to provide � � further input and review on the proposal . 8 � D. The lead agency failed to comply with the prov?- 9 sions .of WAC 197-10-460 (1) wliich requires circulation of the �� draft EIS to each city/county in which adverse environmental � � effects identified in the EIS may occur and to each local agency 12 or political e,ubdivision which will be required to furnish 13 additional public services as a result of the proposed action, by r 14 failing to circulate for comment the draft �IS t� the City of 15 Seattle, King Coun y, City of IIe1lPvue, City oi Rirkland and �� other eastside jurisdictions , and the respect.ive agencies pro- �� viding puUlic services therein. 18 C. The lead ager.cy failed to cemply �aith the 19 requirement of RCW 43 . 21C. 030 and WAC 197-10•-440 by failing to Z� adequately addreGs the existing need for low-income housing and `� failing to adequately ac.dress the imuact of tl�e project on the Z2 need for low-income housing in the draft and final EIS. 23 D. Th � lead agenc;� failed to comply with the 24 I requiremenLs of RC[V 43 .21C.020 and RCW 43 .21C. 030 and WAC 137-10- 25 I 20G and WAC 197-10-920 by adopting uncritically and �,�ithout 26 I adequate review the draft and final T.'IS prepared by the appli- Z� cant's consultants. 26 I E. Tlie lead agency failed co comply with the 29 i requirements of RCW 43 .21C. 030 and WAC 197-10-4qJ by ina,�equately 30 addressing the alternatives available � mitigate *he „dverse 31 impact on low-incomc housinq in the drafl- and final T;IS. 32 NOTICG OF APPPAL -4-