Laserfiche WebLink
( r <br /> Conclusion: Adequate provisions for access,utilities and public services for the <br /> proposal can be accommodated. <br /> 3. The impact of traffic generated by the proposed use on the surrounding area, <br /> pedestrian circulation and public safety; and the ability of the proponent to <br /> mitigate such potential impacts. <br /> Finding: The proposal may generate some minimal traffic associated with the <br /> initial installation and set-up. However,once the facility is operating,no on- <br /> going traffic will be generated,other than occasional maintenance trips. <br /> Conclusion: There will be no adverse traffic impacts generated by the proposal. <br /> 4. The provision of adequate off-street parking, on-site circulation,and site <br /> access. <br /> Finding: No permanent on-site parking is required Ior the proposal. The <br /> associated electrical equipment would be located within the building interior and <br /> would not eliminate any parking stalls. <br /> Conclusion: Not applicable. <br /> S. Compatibility of proposed structures and improvements with surrounding <br /> properties,including the size, height, location,setback and arrangement of <br /> all proposed buildings and facilities,especially as they relate to light and <br /> shadow impacts on more sensitive land uses and less intensive zones. <br /> Findings: The proposed wireless communication facility(WCF)would include a <br /> total of twelve roof mounted antennas(3 sectors n 4 antennas per sector), <br /> electrical cabinet and a cable connection between the facilities. The site is located <br /> at the on the cast side of Colby Avenue between 13t and 14th Streets. The <br /> existing hospital is located in an R-2-I zone and is surrounded by single-fancily <br /> residences and some duplexes. <br /> The project would result in placement of additional antennas on the roof of the <br /> hospital. The Applicant proposed to paint the antennas and cabling to match the <br /> color of the building exterior. <br /> Please also see the findings for Item(12)in the next section. <br /> Conclusion: The proposed 1VCF would result in additional antennas mounted on <br /> the rooftop. which would be more visible than the existing antennas. The <br /> proposed facility would not block views or create light and shadow impacts on <br /> abutting properties because of its relatively small size and separation from the <br /> nearest structures. <br /> C <br /> l� <br /> 2 <br /> 1 <br />