Laserfiche WebLink
� c— <br /> STAFF REPOB'.' i0 BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT <br /> YARIANCE l3��7 <br /> nA�: a�ir z7. 1987 <br /> Appllcant: Joe and Allce F:aker <br /> 1824 Colby <br /> Everett, WA 9£1207 <br /> I,ocation of Property: 1824 Colby <br /> Veriance Requested: From E.M.C. 1g. 15.030, Lot Width, to <br /> a11oW a boundary line ad,justment that <br /> would reduce the width of the lot tYom <br /> 50 feet to 45.5 feet and from <br /> ' � E.M.C. 19.42.040, Side Yards, to allow <br /> an existing accessory storage buildirg <br /> to remain in the rear yard that wi�l <br /> not meet the required flve—foot side <br /> yard setback. <br /> Existing Zoning: R-2, Single Family High Density and <br /> B-1, Nelghbcrhood Business <br /> Existing Land Use: Single Family Resider,ce <br /> Ad�acent Land Uae/Zoring: Nortt�: Single Fami.ly/H-2 <br /> South: Single Famlly/B-1 <br /> East: Single Family/R-2 <br /> Ylest: Sir,gle Family/R-2 <br /> Exhibita: <br /> 1. Vicinity/Zoning Map <br /> 2. Site Plan <br /> 3. Narrative Statemer,t <br /> FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: <br /> 1, That there have been exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or <br /> conditions applying to the sub,ject property or as tu the Sntended use <br /> thereof that do not apply generally to other properties in the same <br /> vicinity or zone. <br /> Finding: The Baker�s property consists of a single family structure <br /> on Lots 20 and 21 of Block 329. The parcel Alze !3 50 feet by 110.05 <br /> feet and contains 5,502.5 square feet. Abutting to Lhe nnrth is Lot <br /> 22 owned by Ralph and Burdina Larsnn aith a single Samily atr�eture <br /> that is lesa than one foot ftom the north boundary line of Lots 20 <br /> and 21. i <br /> The Larsons, owners of Lot 22, wish to purchase four and one—half <br /> feet f1-om the Bakers in order to provide adequate getback for their <br /> tiouse from the property line. The Larsnn�s property is 27.86 feet by <br /> 110.05 conslsting of 3,066 square feet and is nonconfnrming for lnt <br /> Etize, lot Nidth and setback. The proposed boundary line ad,�ustment <br /> Hould make their property less noncor.formirg and the Bakers aould <br /> ntill be conforming for everything but lot width ar,d side setback for <br /> un existing portable shed in the rear yard. <br /> Concluaion: There are unusual clrcumstances applying to the proposed <br /> use of the pr�operty that do not apply generally to other properties <br /> ic� the same vicinity and zone. <br /> � <br />