1822 COLBY AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import

, .� P„_ 7_. That such variar,ce :s r.ecessary for the preserv2tior, ar,d en}oyment of a substantial property right of the appellant possessed by the owners of other properties in the same viMnity or zone. FindSr.g: The purpose of the varlance is to enable the Larson�s property to �,he north to have a side yard for access and maintenance ard Lhis will enable them to ensoy a property right en�oyed by others in the same vicinity and zar,e. Conclusion: The proposed variance is necessary to allow the Larsons a property right en3oyed by others in the vicinity and zone. 3. That the authorizaLion of such variance will not be materially detrimental to thc public welfare or in,�urious t.o property ir. the vicinity or zone in which the property is located. Finding: City departments had no comments regar4lrg this propoaal. The proposed boundary line ad,justment would be beneficial to both parties, since the larsons would be able to have space for acce�s around their home and for maintenance of their home aithout tntruding on the property to the south. The proposed would not aftect any other property owners. Conclusior,: The variance would not be detrimer,tal to the public welfare or ir,�urious to other property, but or the contrary would provide greater privacy for both parties since it would el7minate the need for ir.trusicn or Lots 20 and 21 Cor malntenance of ar,d access around Lot 22. 4. That the grar,ting of' such variarce will r.ot adversely affect the Comprehensive General �lan. Finding: The Comprehenslve Plan designatlon Ss Neighborhocd Business. Single family use is permitted in a neighborhood �usinena zone. Corclusion: The variarce uill not adversely affect the Comprehensive Plan. RECOMMENDATION: APPROVE the varlance as requested by applicant with the fol.loFiing conditions. 1. All conditiors of Final Doundary Lire Adjustment must 4e met. PreFared by �,�N.� ��Y RevieNed by ��i��.� 45 3oF