My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2707 COLBY AVE BASE FILE 2018-01-02 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
COLBY AVE
>
2707
>
BASE FILE
>
2707 COLBY AVE BASE FILE 2018-01-02 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2022 3:56:06 PM
Creation date
1/27/2017 5:01:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
COLBY AVE
Street Number
2707
Tenant Name
BASE FILE
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Jeffrey S. McFall, Everett <br />June 1, 1992 <br />Page 2 <br />Now to your other questions: <br />Q1: Assuming a 500 seat auditorium has stepped center aisles with seating on both sides, the <br />stepped aisles risers and treads conform to 3315(02, and additional side aisles are <br />provided with handrails on one side (the wall side of the side aisle), are handrails <br />required at center aisles? <br />The purpose of an auditorium is to view a performance, if safety considerations <br />interrupt the view (i.e., if the handrails are within normal sightlines of seating) is the <br />purpose defeated? <br />Al: We would have to say that safety considerations override keeping sightlines open. <br />Nonetheless, I find it difficult to see how a 34" high single rail at the side of the seats <br />(plus intermediate rail if a central handrail is used) would block the sight lines. There <br />are two steps between seating platforms which means there is anywhere between a 8" <br />and 14" difference in elevation. I did some informal measurements of the people in our <br />office in their seats and the women averaged 32" above the seat and the men 36". Since <br />the high point of the rail would be behind you on the upper platform and would slope <br />downward I don't see it blocking your view any more than say a taller man or woman <br />sitting in front of you when you are in the center of the seating area. Perhaps the <br />sightlines on the aisle at the bottom rows will have a small blocked area to th-_ left or <br />right by a central handrail, but only if the viewer were looking to the extreme edge of <br />the stage in which case you would again probably have the same problem if you were <br />in the center of the seating areas. It might be uncomfortable to have the rail at just <br />below eye level when you look across the aisles to the other seats but it is far better to <br />have the handrails there in the event that you were about to fall. (I saw this happen two <br />months ago at the Seattle Rep by the way. There are no rails in the balcony seating and <br />an elderly man misjudged the steps and fell hurting himself badly). <br />Q2: Does the back of fixed seating serve as an adequate support in lieu of handrails? <br />A2: The seat back would not provide the gripping and stabilizing effect that a handrail gives <br />you were you about to fall. (I am enclosing an article from our magazine of a few years <br />ago which discusses this issue). Therefore, it is not an acceptable alternative. A series <br />of U-shaped handrails right next to the seats on each side of the two center aisles would <br />provide enough stability and probably reduce the claimed sight line problem. <br />We hope this helps .you in your administration of the new UBC. Thank you for your interest in <br />uniformity of code administration. <br />Very truly yours, <br />Jerry J. Barbera, P.E. <br />Regional Manager Enclosure <br />spm c/Jon Traw <br />Z�L <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.