Laserfiche WebLink
� <br /> ;.-... ,_„� <br /> ;' , <br /> � <br /> � <br /> � <br /> � <br /> � <br /> r '� STAFF REPORT TO BOARD OF ADJUSTMCNT <br /> , //608 CULMBACK BLDG. <br /> DATE: January 4, 1982 <br /> III Applicant: Dale Miller <br /> I 1139 34th Ave. <br /> �! Seattle, WA 98122 � <br /> II 30.� , <br /> Location of Propertye 392�5 Cofby Ave. <br /> Lots 8, 9, Block 717, Plat of Everett <br /> i <br /> Requested Action: A variance from section 19.40.020 of <br /> �I; Everett Municipal Code, off-street <br /> li parking, for provision of four <br /> off-street parking spaces instead of the <br /> �I required 50, ?n conjunction wilh the <br /> �� renovation of an existing building. <br /> I� Existing Zoning: B-3 Central Business Zone <br /> j � <br /> iExisting Land Use: Existing vacant building formerly used , <br /> II to house retail outlet for damaged and <br /> returned furniture for J.C. Penneys <br /> Company. <br /> Adjacent Zoning/Land Use: North: D-3/City Hall park�ng lot <br /> lii South: B-3/Vacant now, retail uses in <br /> the past <br /> East: B-3/City Hall Parking Lot I <br /> lil �ucst: B-3/Commercial Parking lot i <br /> �' Exhi6its: <br /> i � 1. Application Form <br /> 2. Vicinity Map <br /> �� 3. Plot Plan <br /> 4. West Elevation <br /> 5. Renovation Schematic <br />� 6. Agency Comments <br /> i i FWUINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: I <br /> II I I�li L The existing building is of historic significance and was constructed at the time <br /> when no off-street parking was required. <br /> I I I� Conclusion: The historic significance of the existing building limits the <br /> ; i , capability of providing required parking as part of the renovaton. Keeping the <br /> bui�ding in iis present state would be an exceptional or extraordinary <br />' ' circumstance that does not generally apply to other property in the area. <br /> �i; 2. The building was built in 1924 and has functioned as a retail ose without off- <br /> i� street parking for 56 years. <br /> i <br /> i <br /> Conclusion: The variance is necessary for preservation and enjoyment of <br /> substantial property right. <br /> i'� <br /> ,i 3. The building has been in use since 1924. <br />�• Conclusion: The variance will not be detrimental to public welfare since it has � <br /> functioned as a retail use for 56 years without substantial impact on adjucent <br /> properties. <br /> L � <br /> i II <br /> L. i <br />