Laserfiche WebLink
. <br />' • • I - . I <br /> � �' � _ �� <br /> i� <br /> � <br /> I I BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT REPORT <br /> � !{608 CULMBACK BLDG. <br /> - � DATE: January 11, 1982 <br /> I i <br />, I I <br />, Applicant: Dale Miller � <br /> 1139 34th Ave. � <br /> Seattle, WA 93122 i <br />' � Location of Property: 3015 Colby Ave. ! <br /> Lots 8, 9, Block 717, Plat of Everett ' <br /> I <br /> Requested Action: A variance from section 19.40.020 of <br />'� Everett Municipal Code, off-street <br /> I parking, for provision of four additional <br />' off-street parking spaces instead of the <br /> required 50, in conjunction with the � <br /> i <br /> renovation of an existing building. <br />� Existing Zoning: B-3 Central Business Zone i <br /> 1 <br />' Existing Land Use: Existing vacant building formerly used <br />, to house retail outlet for damaged and <br /> i returned furniture for 7.C. Penneys <br /> Company. I <br /> I Adjacent Zoning/Land Use: North: 8-3/City Hall parking lot I <br /> South: B-3/Vacant now, retail uses in i <br /> the past I <br /> East: B-3/City Hall Parking Lot <br /> West: B-3/Commercial Parking lot � <br /> Exhibits: i <br /> 1. Application Form � <br /> Z. Vicinity Map <br /> 3. Plot Plan <br /> 4. West Elevation <br /> 5. Renovation Schematic <br /> 6. Agency Comments <br /> FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: <br /> I <br /> 1. The existing building is of historic significance and was constructed at the time i <br /> when no off-street parking was required. I <br /> i <br /> Conclusion: The historic significance of the existing building limits the !, <br /> capability of providing required parking as part of the renovaton. Keeping the � <br /> building in its present state would be an exceptional or extraordinary j <br /> circumstance that docs not generally apply to other property in the area. � <br /> I 2. The building was built in 1924 and has functioned as a retail use without off- � <br /> street parking for 56 years. I <br /> Conclusion: The variance is necessary for preservation and enjoyment of I <br /> substantial property right. i <br /> 3. The building has been in use since 1924. � <br /> Conclusion: The variance will not be detrimental to public welfare since it has <br /> functioned as a retail use for 56 years without substantial impact on adjacent j <br /> properties. � <br /> I <br /> � <br /> � <br /> i <br /> I <br /> I <br />