3720 COLBY AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import

r " i l I ` � .. -, �, - P �L�iT'1"� .i r . __"' � "_ '_—__ '. ''\ .��- . TO , 1'1 I� , . , arvin C. Ha lund ^ '� - , , i 4 J�CE.'r: �F�o�� • J. D. AScDonald, P.E. DAT[ May 10 , 1971 '� �:�_e�r_cr DRIVEWAY AT 3720 COLBY AVENTJE ��T," a* �v_r�c,�. ��_r.c-r, �vnsHu�cloN Page 2 Backfill material - 18.6 yards @ $5 .00 for a total of $93 or A total construction cost of $533.00 plus Engineering and Inspecti.on Fees, permits, etc. , approximately $125.00 for a total of $658. 00 to block and fill the existing driveway. In this case, a carport would have to be provided. This , I would recommend, be required at the expense of the property owner and not as a project cost. At present, there is a parking apron which was provided by the project to the north side of the driveway entrance which the property owner has been using to park their vehicle. Solution #3 - As has been indicated, there is a considerable change in grade which is due to the location of the driveway and the back of the curb. The present garage can be used providing the property owner retains the present vehicle or purchases a new vehicle which has the same wheel base and clearance characteristics , that does not have additional overhang, front or rear, or is of �� smaller wheel base and overhang size. The existing driveway can be altered so that the vehicle will clear. This would rFquire that � � the curb and gutter, and existing driveway apron, and one-half of _ , �� the driveway be removed. The loop at the front edge increased a '•� .- from 1-inch or approximately 2 inclies or 16/100 's to reduce the � :!, . �' . slope from the curb to the back of the side;�alk. Begin a vertical ='•. .r, curve 2 feet from the back edge of the sidewalk tocaard the street ' , 1,) , and then into the driveway, ending the vertical at the midpoint �.' b;'��' of the existing driveway. This would drop tlte back edge of the Y' `'"" '" sidewalk from a tangent to a point approximately 1 1/2 inches below the tangent line . It would pr.ovide a maximum of 6 inches for water to be retained in the street area before any flooding occurred. This scheme would require that the existing driveway apron and the driveway be removed. Removal costs are estimated to be $59 .00 . Replacing the driveway, apron, and curb, approxima':ely $150 .00 for a total construction cost of $209 .00 which Engineering and Inspection Fees for providing the necessary drawings and inspection and driveway permit, $100 .00 for a total project cost � of $30q.00 . This third solution would alleviate the problem t '-�j provided that the automobile cona '__.�y;:___„ ^�-�} �� a F---- irle ��J 7�. •r, ' � ; s.4�.. � � L '4 ._i i.� :-r L.�'�� C i :�1.> . _1. l/ � "—�t 1+l )/i i a _ e' fiSfi�>� ��.i� �»sfa�a S C.iJ,r/' �i;��f�ri (/�✓�G: ,- : . i / / �C!/�l/�= ��t,� E�� 'l`�y'l�i r> �1 � �f�� .L�¢`!�, !l��`1. � �` �