Laserfiche WebLink
� <br /> 1 <br /> II. Qur request is not based on a depravaticn oP rights arising from special <br /> circumstances apnlying to the property. <br /> _ IiI. We do not feel that the variance requested will be detrlmental to the public � <br /> welfare or 1n�urious to the properties or improvementa in the vicinity. <br /> Our building partnership submitted a nearly identical request for a parking <br /> variance at the time of the origin�l building construction in 1979• That <br /> variance was granted but proved nct to be necessary because the final size <br /> of the building ended-up being substantially smaller than originally <br /> deaigned. We feel that nothing has changed substantially since our firct <br /> application. <br /> N. As our site plan ahow�, parking on the aide hae been maximized. Several <br /> doc�ors in the current building are practicing in an unacceptably small <br /> amount of space. If this variance is not granted, an unnecessary hardship <br /> will ensue, as several of the doctors will need to move out of the buil.ding. <br /> It should be re-emphasized that the proposed expansion of our building <br /> wlll not increase the number of doctois practicing in the building. <br /> V. In the event that this variance ia granted the owners would agree to <br /> coope nte with other p roperties iZ the vicinity who may in the future <br /> request a similar variance. Specifically, the owners would allow pa.rkinF <br /> on the premises by patients referred by them to other p ractioners in the <br /> vicinity. Planting on the sir}e has been maximized within the eonrtraints <br /> of tho parking requiiements in order to maintain the visual q;��.lit,y of t.he <br /> neighborhood and provido a pleasant surrounding for the existing bus ctop. <br /> For the abwe reasons we feel that our request is reasonable and that if <br /> granted it will serve the intent oF the code. <br /> 4 <br /> EXh�b� at �{ <br /> L .� <br /> � <br />