My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2005/01/26 Council Agenda Packet
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2005
>
2005/01/26 Council Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/3/2017 11:40:25 AM
Creation date
2/3/2017 11:40:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Agenda Packet
Date
1/26/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
83
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
9 <br /> (a) Service Level III Cities will be denied housing of new Bookings until such time as <br /> the population is reduced by a number of inmates sufficient to allow housing of new <br /> inmates. <br /> (b) If the actions of Section 6 (a) are insufficient to reduce inmate population below the <br /> maximum acceptable population level, Service Level III Cities will be required to remove <br /> their inmates. The order in which Service Level III Cities will be required to remove their <br /> inmates is set forth in Exhibit C and is incorporated by reference. <br /> (c) If the actions of Sections 6(a) and (b) are insufficient to reduce inmate population <br /> below the maximum acceptable population level, Service Level II Cities will be required to <br /> remove inmates housed in excess of their agreed upon number. The order in which Service <br /> Level II Cities will be required to remove their inmates is set forth in Exhibit C and <br /> incorporated by reference. <br /> (d) If the actions of Sections 6(a), (b) and (c) are insufficient to reduce inmate <br /> population below the maximum acceptable population level, Service Level II Cities will be <br /> required to reduce the number of inmates housed in the jail to a number less than their <br /> agreed upon number. The order in which Service Level II Cities will be required to remove <br /> their inmates is set forth in Exhibit C and incorporated by reference. A Service Level II <br /> CITY will not be financially responsible for the difference between its agreed upon <br /> population level and the allowed population level under this section. <br /> (e) Service Level I Cities will not be required to reduce involuntarily the number of <br /> inmates housed in the jail unless all Service Level II and III Cities have removed all of their <br /> inmates or a Force Majeure event occurs. <br /> (f) If the CITY is required to remove CITY inmates pursuant to Section 6 (b), (c), (d) <br /> or (e), the CITY shall have seventy two (72) hours from the time of notification to remove <br /> the CITY inmates. The CITY will have discretion over which CITY inmates the CITY <br /> removes, PROVIDED that if a CITY inmate has active charges (as defined in Exhibit A) <br /> from another agency or agencies, all agencies having active charges must agree to allow the <br /> CITY to remove the inmate from the Jail. If an agency or agencies object, then the inmate <br /> shall not be considered a CITY inmate, but shall be billable to another agency in accordance <br /> with Exhibit A "Inmate Status" 2 (b). The CITY will then choose a different inmate to <br /> remove from the Jail. <br /> Section 7. Placing CITY Inmates in Jail by Law Enforcement Personnel. <br /> Subject to the conditions stated herein, and the constraints listed in Section 6, the COUNTY <br /> will accept arrested persons delivered to the Jail for confinement, including persons arrested for, or <br /> convicted of,violations of the CITY Municipal Code and will hold them until such time as they are <br /> lawfully discharged from custody pursuant to law, or returned to the <br /> Interlocal Agreement for Jail Services Page 4 of 20 <br /> 2005-2009 <br /> 61 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.