4717 EVERGREEN WAY 2016-01-01 MF Import

�_ �n � � � P � Claremont Village Inc. Contract Rezone Agreement 797-81 p � o Page -4- c N � H N � 11. The Applicant proposed access to Phase II in three locatioas. The first o � o loca[ion of access vill be off Nilmington Avenue. In addition, the ro y H � Applicant proposed an access off 47th Street at the very uorthern end of '� � � � the site. Ttte Applicant also requested an accesa off Evergreen Way near the center portion of Phase iI as it fronts Evergreen Way. o ., " " R� , 12. The City initially ob�ected to access off Evergreea for Phase II and z H � I wanted the access limited to the access from Wilmingtoa Avenue and 47th � y � '�, Street. The Applicant argued that some accese off Evergreen Way must be � I provlded for the site to be effective. N C y ,� ro r � 13. The Applicant indicated that 6arriers or projections could fie used to � � ,� y ! prevent direct acress from Phase II to the southbound laues of Evergree¢ y Way. The Applicant stated that the access from the site to Evergreen � i Way could be restricted to a r'.bht-hand tum norYh direction only. 14. The City indicated that further study would have to be made to revieW ' the proposed egress from Phase II to the northbound lanes of Evergreen IWay. The City indicated that elimination of left-hand turns onto � i Evergreen Way may be appropriate. I15. In addition to the access points as mentioned, the Appllcant proposed a I left tum lane from the southbound lanes of Evergreen Way onto � Wilmington Avenue in order to provide direct access to Ptuises I and t � u' ��r� ; 16. At the public hearing testimony was submitted as follows: �� i � • Mike Brust - The witness stated that he lives east of the site. He 1 � stated that many of the delivery trucks that use the alley east of Phase � '�... I and SOth Street are disruptive to the neighborhood. He sutmitted that �� there �hould be some restrictio¢s for delivery trucks to travel east , � through the adjoining neighborhoods, and, that all delivery trucks i should have to access onto Evergreen Way. The witness su6mitted that '�� i the closure of Wilmington Avenue is supported by the neighborhood. He � �� contended that Wilmington Avenue should not be a source of access for ' delivery Crucks. � CONCLUSIONS I ��. � �� I 1. The appllcation is for the approval o£ an amendment to a contract rezone 1 for the development af property fcom 47th to SOth Street o¢ Evergreeu � Way, °verett, Washing[on. The original contract rezone entered between +� _ � , � the City and the Applicant's predecessor on August 12, 1989, allowed for � I co�ercial developmenr of the site conaistent vrith the conditions of the I I , rezone. :tro ameudm•ants to the rezone have heen approved by the City. '� i The Applicant'e rcquest is for a rezove to cteate a development that is more consistent with the new zoning codes of the City of Everett and �'`�� i minor changes in the permitted uses, parking, laadecaping, and signing. �