Laserfiche WebLink
� <br /> �y�c <br /> t <br /> �1 , , ... <br /> � ti ei . <br /> � � <br /> H � <br /> � yy ��.. <br /> � � z The conclusions and recommcndations presented in this report arc bascd on the 5 exploration <br /> � pits completed for this swdy. The number, location, and dcpth of thc explorations were <br /> o c o ` completed within site and budgetary constraints. Because of the nature of exploratory work <br /> '° y ,ro, �+ below ground, extrapolation of subsudace conditions between field explorations is necessary. <br /> � � � It should be notcd that dit(ering subsurface conditions may sometimes be present due to the <br /> ' random nature of deposition and the alteration of topography by nast gradmg and/or filling. <br /> °z n o �^ The nawre and extent of any variations between the field explorat�ons may not become fully <br /> � ;° � evident until construction. If variations are observed at that time, it may be necessary to re- <br /> � y � evaluate specific recomr�endati�ns in this report and make appropriate changes. <br /> z, �: <br /> � y H '- 3.1 Exploration Pits <br /> o m <br /> � � r �', Exploration pits were excavatcd with a tractor-mounted backhoe. The pits permitled direct, <br /> �' visual obsen•ation of subsurface conditions. Materials encountered in lhe exploration pits were <br /> y � N studied and classified in the ficld by z ficld geologist from our firm. All explonUon pits were <br /> backfilled immediately after examination and logging. Selected samples were then transported <br /> to our laboratory for further visual classification and testing, az necessary. <br /> 4.Q SUB�TRFACE CONDITIONS <br /> Subsudace conditions at the project site were infcrred from the fcld explontions accomplished <br /> ' for this study, visual reconnaissance of the site and review �f topography provided on the <br /> previously mentioned topographic survey and in applicable gr;ologic literature. As shown on <br /> the field logs, the explorauon prts gencrally encountered fill materials overlying natural <br /> deposits oi medium dense sands overlymg dense sands. The following section presents more <br /> l — detailed subsuriace information. <br /> � � � <br /> �� 4] Stratieraohv <br /> Fill soils (those not namnlly placed) werc encoumered in all of the exploration pits. The fill <br /> 1 ��� ranged in thickness from a minimum of 2 feet to a maximum of 9 feet in EP-4 and EP-3, <br /> �..` • respectively. As noted on lhe exploration ]ogs, the majority of fill consisted of inedium dense <br /> i � ' to dense, moist, grey, brown and 1an, fine to medium sand wuh some silt, gravel and organics. <br /> These materials appeared to be in a denser condition in the area where vlilmington Avenue <br /> ��.� used to be located. This is also the generallocatiun for the proposed building. In the <br /> Ir�� proposed parking areas, the upper 1-1/2 to 2 feet of the fill was in a loose to medium dense <br /> cond�uon. <br /> ' Natural soils beneath the fill materials consisted for the most part of inedium dense, moist, <br /> I �� brownish orange, fine ro medium sands with some silt and occas�onal charcoal pieces. With <br /> depth, this material became greyer and contained ]ess silt. This material was found to extend <br /> to a maximum depth of approx�mately I1 feet below the exi;,ting ground surface in EP-1 and <br /> +, �,� EP-3. This matc:ial has been interpreted as recessional outwash sediraents depositcd from <br /> I ��,�I . meltwaters dur.ng the retreat oF the last glacial ice front. <br /> ; Underlying the recessional soil, and beneath the fill where recessional sediments were absent, <br /> � a dense, moist, grey, medium sand was encountered. The rop of this material was cnwuntered <br /> ���, between ]0 and 11 fcet decp in EP-1 through EP-3. In E-P-4 and EP-5, a medium dcnse to <br /> deuse with depth, fine to medium sand which graded into a fine to coarse sand with some <br /> gravel was observed below the fill material. The dense sands noted above have been <br /> 3 <br /> r • <br />