5830 EVERGREEN WAY 2016-01-01 MF Import

� • ( ; �) l. There are exceptional circumstances or conditions such as: locations of existing structures, lo[ configuracion, ropo�>raphic or unique physical features that apply to the ' subject proper[y which prohibi� the applicant from meeting the standards of this Ordinance and would result in a bet[er design; and Finding: A Category II stream flows �hrough the middle of[he property. This limics ' the building areas of lots 3 and 3. The building sites will be placed behind lot l ra[her than along Flemin¢ Streec Conclusion: The dep�h of lo[ l needs t� be reduced below 30 Fee[ in order to provide adequate building si[es forlots 3 and 3. 2. The authorization of [he modification or variation will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property in the viciniry or zone in which the property is located; and Finding: The proposed duplex on lot l will meec [he 30 foot front se[back from Flemin¢ Street. The duplex will be required to meet design standards under Subsection 7.010. Conciusion: � dupler can still bP located on lot I wi�hout being detrimental to the public welfare or injurious [o the property in the vicinity. � . 3. A hardship would be incurred by the applican[ if he complied with the stric[ appiication of the regulations. • Findings: Front setbacks for lots Z and 3 have been reduced to the minimum afiowable. If lot I was required to have an 80 foot lot depth, lots 2 or 3 would be ' eliminated. The density would be reduced further below the density range under the Comprehensive Plan. Conclusion: A hardship would be incurred by the applicant if a lot.was eliminated. Conclusion: All proposed lots meet zoning code requirements escept for Lot l. Lot 1 meets the criteria for a variance from the 80 fooc minimum lot depth requirement. E. Natur�l Environment - Evaluation of the impacts and provision for mitigation of all impacts on all elements of the natural environment inciuding topography, vegetation, .; soils, geology and all environmental issues as defined in the State �nvironmental Policy Act, ; WAC 197.1 l and Chapter 18.24. i Findings: Pi�eon Creek No. I Elows westeriy through the site. A 50 foot buffer is required from the edge of the stream. On Lot 4, the appiicant is unable to provide the � minimum 50 foot buffe: because of existing swctures and a required 6reroad access to the � west side of the existing building and the proposed addition. All existing structures (house �