5830 EVERGREEN WAY 2016-01-01 MF Import

, � c�- , , � and shed) and imprnvements (gravel road to be used for fire access) may remain within the buffer. On lots 2 and 3, the applicant proposes to reduce the minimum buffer width on the south side of the stream to 25 feet in order to construct a retention/detention pond and . Subsection 37.140.0 of the City of Evere[t Zoning Code gives the Planning Director the authority to reduce the s[andard stream buffer width only when there has been substantial legal altera[ion of the stream and/or its buf�'er and the remaining buffer is enhanced :y sufficiently to improve the functional values of the buffer and/or the wetland. The 50 foot buffer has been altered as described in �he Conceptual Enhancement, Mitiaation, and Protection Plan dated 10/7/93. Conclusioa�s: :� mitigation plan to enhance the remainir.g 25 m 50 foot buffer dated April 1G, 1996 has becn accepted by the Planning Department as meeting the requirements of Section 37 of the City of Everect Zoning Code. However, the number of�rails within the • buffer shall be limited to one trail. This trail may cross the stream to connect the easemenc road from Flemin¢ to the ofFce fron:ir�g Evergreen Way. F. Drainage - Evaluation of all drainage impacts and provisions made for mitigation of all drainage impacts as defined in the City's Comprehensive Drainage Ordinance and y Chapter 18.24. Findings: The proposed project is located in the Pigeon Creek No. I Drainage Basin. � .i : Conclusions: Drainage impacts will be mitigated by providing drainage and water quality facilities per Ci[y Standards. :� G. Ope� Sp�ce - Evalua�ion of all impacts and provision for open space as defined in " Chapter I8.24. � Finding: The R-2 zone allows up to a maximum lot coverage of 40% by structures. A portion of the site is considered an environmentally sensitive area which provides a large amount of open space. A ; Conclusion: Adequate provision for open space can be provided within this short subdivision. , F. Public Systems Capacity - Evaluation of all impacts and provisions made for , mitigation of impacts on public systems including parks, schools, and communiry facilities as defined in Chapter 18.24. Finding: The proposed short subdivision is within the Everett School District. The s Everett School District has commented that this short subdivision will have an adverse d . • impact on the District. Canclusion: The School District has identified impacts and has requesttd Reservation or Dedication of land for school sites. In lieu of dedication of land, the District has requested