Laserfiche WebLink
! <br /> � Sub.rurface Erplorarion, Geofogic Ha�ard, and <br /> Norcring Hape Pharr!1 PrNiminary Geotuhnica!Englnetring Rtparr <br /> Errrrrr, {4'ashirtgran D[rign Recommendnt(nns <br /> � The latersl pr�ssures presented above are based on the conditions of a uniform backfill <br /> consiseing of on-site, glacial soils compacted to 90 percent of ASTM:D 1557. A higher degree <br /> of compaction is not recommended, as this will inerease the pressure acting on the wall. A <br /> � low•er compaction may resul[ in setdement of the slab-on-grade above the walls. Thus, the <br /> com�action level is critical and must be tested by our firm during placement. Perimeter <br /> � foo�ing drains should be provideci for all retaining walls as discussed under the section on <br /> Drninage Consideratrons. <br /> � It is imperative that proper drainage be provided so that hydrostatic pressures do not develop <br /> against the wall. This would involve iustallation of a minimum 1-foot-wide washed gravel <br /> blanket drain, which is continuous with the perimeter footing drain and eztends to within 1 <br /> � foot of the ground surface. _ <br /> 12.2 Passi��e Resistance nnd Friction Factors <br /> � Lateral loads can be resisted by fric[ion benveen the foundation and the natural glacial soils or <br /> supporting structural 6ll soils, or by passive ear[h pressure acting on the buried portions of the <br /> � foundations. The foundations must be backfilled with compacted structural fill and compacted <br /> to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry densiry to achieve the passive resistance provided <br /> � beloa•. �Ve recommend the foliowing desien parameters: <br /> • Passive equivalent fluid = 250 pcf <br /> ( � Coefficient of hiction = 0.30. <br /> i <br /> The above values are allowable and include a safery factor of atleast I.S. <br /> � I?.3 GeoeridT`� Reinforced Fill <br /> 1 Based on our review of the site topography, soil conditions, and intended use of the proposed <br /> � building area, the western slope could be buttressed with GeogridTN reinforced fill. Using <br /> � proven technology, fill is reinforced in horizontal layers with a very strong, plastic GeogridT" <br /> mat that exrends into the hillside filL This reinforced fill may be faced with a property <br /> designed mociular block wall or rockery. It should be noted that the facing will not be required <br /> � to provide any lateral suppoR for the fill; the entire support is developed ttuough thc <br /> GeogridT`+ mat layers. The facing is to protect the reinforced soils from erosion. For this <br /> project, the reinforced fill wedge would be keyed into the medium dense recessional outwash <br /> ' soils at an approximate depth of S to 7 feet below existing toe-of-slope grades. We have <br /> attached a diagram of a GeogridT'" reinforced fill s(ope with a rockery facing, for informational <br /> purposes only, as Figure 3. The actual engineering design of this fill and the desired facing <br /> Irype wili be completed once a wall type is chosen and grading plans are developed. AESI can <br /> provide site-specific �esign plans for insertion into the permit package upon request. <br /> � Frbruary 1/, 1CO2 ASSOCfATED 6,1RTH SCIENCE$ lNC. <br /> sc�r,ld-XFA1:�9A:.ProJreiCL17/719iKFlWp.µ:g Page 13 / <br /> I ' /� <br />