My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6807 EVERGREEN WAY 2016-01-01 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
EVERGREEN WAY
>
6807
>
6807 EVERGREEN WAY 2016-01-01 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2017 3:51:41 PM
Creation date
2/9/2017 10:57:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
EVERGREEN WAY
Street Number
6807
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
323
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY <br />JMD Architecture <br />April 19, 1999 <br />Groundwater <br />F-8689 <br />Page 3 <br />Groundwater was not encountered in any of our borings. As such, we do not anticipate <br />groundwater seepage will result in significant construction related issues. However, the <br />contractor should be made aware that groundwazer is not static. There will be fluc:uations <br />in the level depending on the season, amount of rainfall, surface water runoff, and other <br />factors. Generally, the water level is higher and seepage rate is greater in the wetter winter <br />months (typically October through May). <br />Laboratorv Testinq <br />Laboratory tests were conducted on several representative soil samples to verify or modify <br />the field soil classification and to evaluate the general physical properties and engineering <br />characteristics of the soil encoun�ered. Visual fieid classifications were supplemented by grain <br />size analyses on representative soil samples. Moisture content tests were performed on all <br />samples. The results of laboratory tests performed on specific samples are provided either <br />at the appropriate sample depth on the individual boring logs or on a separate data sheet <br />contained in Appendix S. It is important to note that these test results may not accurately <br />represent the overall in-situ soil conditions. Our geotechnical recommend.;rions are based on <br />our interpretation of th�se test results and their use in guiding our enginee� �ng judgment. ECI <br />cannot be responsible for tne interpretation oi` these data by others. <br />�n accordance with our Standard Fee Schedule and General Conditions, the soil samples for <br />this project will be discarded after a period of fifteen days following completion of this report <br />unless we are otherwise directed in writing. <br />DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br />General <br />Based on the results of our study, it is our opinion the site can be cleveloped generally as <br />planned. Support for the build�ng can be provided using a conventional spread and continuous <br />footing foundation system bearing on the competent native soil or on fill used to modify site <br />grades. Our borings indicate the upper three to five feet of the site soil is loose. In our <br />opinion, the loose soil may be possible fill. Where these soils are encountered at the footing <br />subgrade elevation, they should be compacted in place to the requirement� of structural fill. <br />Slab-on-grade floors may be similarly supported. <br />Eanh Con:uhant�, Inc. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.