7202 EVERGREEN WAY BASE FILE 2018-01-02 MF Import

T� FROAI onrc SUL'Jf:=T ._ � Lloyd Henning-// 4t, 3/� � Fred Oehlert�� March 6, 1974 REPORT PROCliSSING OF BUILDING:iiEPiRMim��tr. Evcn�rr. �vns��iNCTor� 7202 l:vergreen Way As you are aware, the procedures and policies of the City are always open for review, and constructive criti- cism is appreciated. We feel, however, that in the case of the sub7ect permit, our procedures were not at fault as I hope to �emonstrate in this report. To properly review the procedure, we should take a look at the following sequence of steps taken during the approval of the subject buildina permit. A. The application for a buildinq p�•rmit was sub- mitted on June 7, 1973. During the processing of the application, it was noted on the application form that the approval was pending based upon the development of the improvements within the City Rights-of-Way. At this time a proposed standard cf improvements for the �vergreen Way Rights-of-6Vay was being reviewed. This was pointed out to the architect that the proposed plan did not meet the proposed standard and we suggested that rather than install- ing something that might have to be removed, it would be better to adopt an alternate plan. A compromise solution was recommended and coordina- ted with Mr. Bryan's staff. These conditions were subsequently discussed with Mr. Bryan and were noted on the application for a driveway permit. At this time Mr. Bryan expressed concern of the engineering cost and did not wisli to accumulate any additional expense for revising the construction plans. B. The Contractor submitted the application for a driveway and right-of-way improvement permit on July 31, 1973. It was approved on August 3, 1973, two days after the bUilding permit was issued. C. The Contractor submitted a letter on December 11, 1973 requesting temporary occupancy approval because of the poor weather conditions and that he could not complete the paving and landscaping, which approval caas granted. �