My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7601 EVERGREEN WAY BASE FILE 2018-01-02 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
EVERGREEN WAY
>
7601
>
BASE FILE
>
7601 EVERGREEN WAY BASE FILE 2018-01-02 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/14/2022 4:07:22 PM
Creation date
2/9/2017 11:59:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
EVERGREEN WAY
Street Number
7601
Tenant Name
BASE FILE
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
320
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
lo <br />r loon S. <br />DATE <br />SEPA 1181-.r) (Page Two) <br />SU"JECT CCTV OF CVEn ETT, CVEIIETT WASI IIMITON <br />7. Existing water main on Evergreen Way can provide adequate domestic service. <br />System shall be designed to conform to fire flow requirements determined <br />by City Fire Marshal. <br />S. Phase 1 and it shall provide a covenant consenting to a Local Improvement <br />District for off -site improvements indicated by the Pigeon Creek #1 Drainage <br />Basin Plan. <br />9. In 1977 a specified identified need for a traffic bypass between Evergreen <br />Way and Casino Road was established after considerable input. As a result <br />of development in the area and considering geographic and neighborhood <br />concerns, the location of the bypass was determined as shown on the attached <br />exhibit. At this time it has been a deter that cbnstru n of the bypass facility <br />along with other improvemer t previously construct��will mitigate the impact <br />-- - of Cascade Shopping Center traffic-on-Gvepgteen-',-y, 75th Street, and the <br />intersection of SR 526 with Evergreen Way. The type of public bypass facility <br />that would accomplish such mitigation would consist of a 36 foot wide'street <br />with sidewalks on both sides from Evergreen Way east 300 feet, and a 24- - <br />foot wide street with sidewalks on theserth;�Ideeabutf g the shopping center <br />to the nwst extreme southeastern-4 of the proposal and an interim 20 foot <br />street with 4 foot pedestrian shoulders o� n both sides for approximately 500 �_ <br />feet to intersect with Casino Roagk Such a facilit wou ainclude zFstreet <br />light system and a traffic signal at Evergreen Way, drainage improvements <br />and buffering for adjacent properties. <br />Since the bypass as outlined above would not meet City Standards for street <br />construction and would only provide a portion of the needs of the general <br />traveling public and other properties in the area, as has been previously identified, <br />it is proposed that the improvement of the bypass (temporarily known as <br />77th Street) consist of a 36 foot (or 40 foot) wide street with sidewalks on <br />both sides from Evergreen Way to Casino Road, including lighting, drainage, <br />and a signal at Evergreen Way. And, that such an improvement be financed <br />via Local Improvement District Assessment with the cost of the "mitigation <br />improvements" (except only 50% of the signal) be assessed to Cascade Shopping <br />Center. The remainder of the cost to be assessed to other benefitted properties <br />along with (if determined appropriate by City Council) City participation. <br />Should the L.I.D. fail, the responsibility of designing, building and financing <br />the "mitigation improvements" shall revert to, and be accomplished prior <br />to occupancy permits being issued for Phase II Cascade Shopping Center structures <br />(except that only 50% of the cost of the signal installation shall be the responsibility <br />of Cascade Shopping Center. <br />It is further recommended that if it is consistent with the City Attorne) : recommendation <br />that the e: isting Concommitant Ordinance be repealed and replaced by a single <br />ordinance addressing both phases of the development. This recommendation ,s <br />based on current misunderstanding of the application of the ordinance to Phase <br />i <br />I improvements between City, Proponent and potside parties. <br />t <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.