Laserfiche WebLink
� <br /> 3. Although the City has not provided daily inspection of the subject <br /> property, adequate testimony has been presented by a fortner tenant that <br /> the tenancy allowed at the RV park exceeded the maximum allowed 48 <br /> hours. These tenancies are in violation of condition #16 of SPU Permit II <br /> #1-96, which limited stays to a maximum of 48 hours. Owa is in violation <br /> of condition #16 of the SPU Permit. (findings 5, 6 & 7) <br /> 4. Adequate testimony has been presented to support that there were more <br /> than 12 vehicles being placed on-site at the RV park. The approval of <br /> the SPU Permit II #1-96 specifically limited the RV park to a twelve space <br /> RV park. Owa is in violation of this portion of SPU Permit II #1-96. <br /> (finding 6) <br /> 5. Adequate testimony has been presented to support that electrical permits <br /> were not approved for all the uses on-site. Owa is in violation of <br /> condition #2 of SPU Permit II #1-96 in that an electrical permit has not <br /> been secured for all electrical services on-site. (finding 5) <br /> 6. Condition #8 of SPU Permit II #1-96 required landscaping requirements <br /> to be satisfied. Although testimony is conflicting as to whether or not this <br /> condition was satisfied, the City has met the burden in proving that the <br /> landscaping does not satisfy condition #8. A landscape strip of a <br /> minimum of five feet wide has not been provided along the north, south <br /> and west property lines and the other requirements, incfuding the <br /> landscaping plan with various landscaping conditions, have not been <br /> provided. (finding 8) <br /> DECISION <br /> Based upon the preceding findings of facts and conclusions, testimony and <br /> evidence submitted at the public hearing, it is hereby ordered that Owa is in <br /> violation of the following paragraphs as set forth in the June 1, 1999, code <br /> violation citation issued to him: <br /> (1) Approval of your request was conditioned upon a requirement that <br /> stays at the park be limited to a maximum of 48 hours. <br /> Inspections on April 26, 1999, and May 3, 1999, revealed that <br /> stays are not being so limited. In addition, one of the inhabitants <br /> at the subject property reported that he pays monthly rent for his <br /> space at the subject property. <br /> �� <br />