10925 EVERGREEN WAY 2016-01-01 MF Import

r � . does not feel it appropriate to allow longer tenancy on lots not meeting mobile home park standards. (exhibit 7) 2. On June 26, 1996, the City of Everett Planning Director granted approval to a request of the Appellant for a Special Property Use Permit (SPU II #1-96)for a twelve space RV park on one acre of land at 10925 Evergreen Way, Everett, Washington. The SPU was granted subject to 17 conditions. Included in the conditions was condition #16 which limited stays at the RV park to a maximum of 48 hours. (exhibit 18) On November 19, 1998, the Appellant submitted an application (expansion application)for the Special Property Use Permit. (exhibit 32) 3. The City reviewed the application of the Appellant and conducted hnro field inspections on-site. In these inspections and review, the City determined that the site was not consistent with the use that had been approved in SPU II #1-96. (exhibit 10) In the administrative determination set forth in a letter to the Appellant of April 29, 1999, the City stated in part: In summary, the City has determined that the existing use is not consistent with the previously approved SPU II #1-96, and the Ciry will not review the cuRent application for the expansion of the RV park since the current use is not functioning as an RV park and is not a permitted use in the C-t zone. As such, the existing use is illegal, and you must terminate the cuRent use. (exhibit 10) 4. Mr. Owa, in submitting the application, was provided the required forms from the City of Everett Planning Department. He completed the forms and submitted them with a filing fee. (Cross examination of Bob Landles) 5. At no time prior to the April 29, 1999, letter to Mr. Owa was he informed that the application was incomplete. (Cross examination of Bob Landles) 6. The City was unable to provide any specific ordinance supporting its position that the City is not obligated to process an application. The City did not cite a rule or regulation that allows it to refuse to process an application. (Landles testimony) 5/9