|
FOOTNOTES
<br />1 .
<br />Cf
<br />Bd.
<br />Smith v. COI I i son , 113 Cap App 180, 6
<br />or oning
<br />Ptd(
<br />1 931); Devaney
<br />A PPea
<br />v. Lid. of Zoning
<br />s, 132 Conn. 537; 45
<br />Ad'ustment, 147
<br />Ad2
<br />v.
<br />828 (194 ; ou ouse
<br />Me 387,
<br />87 Ad2
<br />670 (1952T.
<br />2. Cf
<br />American Sion
<br />Co V Fowler, 276 SW2d
<br />651
<br />(Ky'1955).
<br />3. Cf
<br />NE
<br />Lincoln Trust
<br />209 (1920).
<br />Co. v Williams Bld . Corp.,229
<br />NY 313, 128
<br />4. Jonas v. Fleming Town Bd. E Zoning Bd, of Appeals, 51 Ad2d 473,
<br />382 NYS 2d 394 (4th Dept 1976).
<br />5. I.C. 36-7-4.
<br />6. Euclid v. Ambler Realty 3 Co., 272 U.S. 65 4
<br />303 192 . ' 7 S Ct 114 , 71 L Ed
<br />7. Cf Zahn v. Bd, of Pub. Works , 274 U.S.
<br />Ed 325, 47 S CL 574, 71 L
<br />107 1927 ; and Garieb v. Fox, 274 U.S. 603, 47 S. Ct. 675,
<br />71 L Ed 1228 (1927) -
<br />8. Cf Sup. Ct. in Nectow v. CambridQe (U.S. 183, 48 S. Ct. 447,
<br />72 L Ed 842 (192 .
<br />9. Cf Scrutton v. County of Sacramento, 275, Cal App 2nd, 79 Cal
<br />Rptr 72 k 19 9) ; Troiano v. Zoning Comm'n of Town of No. Bran-
<br />ford, 155 Conn 265, 231 A2d 536 0:76/) ; and, Trust Co —OF Chica o
<br />v. City of Chicano, 408 111 91, 96 NE 2nd 499 (1851 T.
<br />10 -CF State v. Sessent, 27 Wisc. 2d 537, 135 NW 2d 317 (1965).
<br />11.Ibid. , and J.D. Construction Co, v. Bd. of Ad'., 119 NJ Super 140,
<br />290 A2d 452 k 1972) . .
<br />12.Ibid. , and Fischer v. Bedminster Twp., 11 NJ 194, 93 A2d 378 (1952)
<br />13 -For a more complete discussion of this subject, see Mathew
<br />Bender, Book V, .Chapter III, Sections 11.01,11.02 and 11.03,
<br />14.Cf 421 US 50, 96 S Ct 2440, 49 L Ed 2d 310, rch denied 97 S Ct
<br />191 (1976) , rev'd 518 F2d 1014 (6th Ci r 1975) .
<br />E VER00088
<br />
|