Laserfiche WebLink
Those citing negative impacts from adult establishments noted crime most frequently, and <br />quality of life impacts such as littering, noise, late night operations, offensive signage, and <br />general perceptions about neighborhoods or certain streets. For example, the President of the <br />42nd Street Development Project, referring to a concentration of sex-related uses on 42nd <br />Street between Seventh and Eighth Avenues, cited a 60 percent drop in crime after the Project <br />took title to two-thirds of the project area in April, 1990 and a majority of the 'site was <br />cleared. The operator of a not-for-profit SRO stated that persons loitering near two adult <br />establishments located across the street from the residence have made the street "intim- <br />idating," giving it a "different feeling" from that which had existed before the second adult <br />use moved to the street. Some observed that offensive signage depicting eroticism or sexually <br />explicit words were noted as especially problematic for children; sometimes these signs were <br />located,near school bus stops. <br />Some noted that the impacts from adult entertainment establishments were positive, e.g., a <br />burlesque theater owner stated that her business provided 50 percent of the business of the <br />commercial parking lot located.across the street. The positive impacts of adult entertainment <br />establishments were further noted in a meeting held by DCP and industry representatives. They <br />maintain that their businesses earn revenue for the city, provide jobs, and stimulate tourism. <br />Through the fall of 1993 and continuing into 1994, DCP surveyed street and signage <br />conditions, local organizations and businesses, real estate brokers, and police and sanitation <br />officers, and analyzed criminal complaint and property assessment data for six study areas <br />throughout the city to obtain information about the impacts of adult entertainment establish- <br />ments. Four of the six study areas were in boroughs other than Manhattan and in some cases <br />contained a single isolated adult use. Surveyors found few problems but much of the work <br />involving street conditions (noise, loitering, litter) was done during the winter months, and <br />the results should be reviewed with caution. <br />Significantly, the survey noted that signage for the adult entertainment establishments is <br />characteristically at odds with that of other nearby commercial establishments. In half the <br />study areas, signage for the adult use occupies a greater percentage of storefront surface <br />area than other commercial uses located within the same blockfronts. In one study area, <br />accessory business signs cover approximately 25 to 40 percent of the storefront surface <br />area, but the adult use signage occupies 80 to 100 percent of such area. In four of the six <br />study areas, adult use si-nage tends to be illuminated when that of non -adult commercial <br />uses is not. In one study area, approximately 80 percent of the ground floor commercial <br />accessory business signs are non -illuminated; in stark contrast 75 percent of the adult . <br />63 EVERool61 <br />