My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2005/06/15 Council Agenda Packet
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2005
>
2005/06/15 Council Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/24/2017 2:25:37 PM
Creation date
2/10/2017 11:05:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Agenda Packet
Date
6/15/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
901
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Consultants' Final Report - Page 11 <br />constitutional in Young v. American Mini Theatres, Inc. 14 This model has been <br />adopted by numerous cities including Los Angeles and twelve other Southern <br />California cities for controlling adult businesses.15 <br />While the dispersal model has been found constitutionally valid, several <br />subsequent court decisions have limited the way in which municipalities can adopt <br />1 <br />4 427 U.S. 50 (1976) (Hereinafter Mini Theatres). This decision is often cited as <br />the legal basis for a dispersal approach, however the opinion appears to support the <br />constitutionality of both the dispersal and concentration models: <br />It is not our function to appraise the wisdom of its [Detroit's] decision <br />to require adult theaters to be separated rather than concentrated in <br />the same areas. In either event, the city's interest in attempting to <br />preserve the quality of urban life is one that must be accorded high <br />respect. Moreover, the city must be allowed a reasonable opportunity <br />to experiment with solutions to admittedly serious problems (427 U.S. <br />50, 71). <br />Indeed the Supreme Court upheld the Constitutionality of the concentration model <br />in Renton, "Cities may regulate adult theaters by dispersing them, as in Detroit, or by <br />effectively concentrating them, as in Renton."(infra note 16 at 52). <br />15 The best single source for information on this topic is the Los Angeles City <br />Council Planning Committee. According to the LA Study: <br />Locally, the cities of Bellflower and Norwalk have enacted ordinances <br />requiring adult bookstores and theaters to obtain a conditional use permit. As <br />a part of their study the City of Bellflower surveyed over 90 cities in Southern <br />California to determine how other cities were controlling adult bookstores. Of <br />the cities which responded to the Bellflower survey, 12 require a conditional <br />use permit for new bookstores. The conditions for obtaining such a permit <br />generally include dispersal and distance requirements based upon the Detroit <br />model. Bellflower also includes. (LA Studv supra note at 12). <br />The LA Studv also presents a table listing 9 cities nationally that have taken a <br />dispersal zoning approach (Id., Table 11). <br />EVER00351 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.