Laserfiche WebLink
Consultants' Final Report - Page 10 <br />where they were deemed inappropriate. In addition, concentration of adult <br />businesses might aid in the policing of such activities and would make it easier for <br />those who wanted to avoid such businesses to do so. There has been some <br />question as to the effectiveness of this regulatory approach, as the LA Study <br />observed: <br />The effectiveness and appropriateness of the Boston approach is a subject <br />of controversy. There has been some indication that it has resulted in an <br />increase in crime within the district and there is an increased vacancy rate <br />in the surrounding office buildings. Due to complaints of serious criminal <br />incidents, law enforcement activities have been increased and a number of <br />liquor licenses in the area have been revoked. Since the "Combat Zone" <br />and most of the surrounding area are part of various redevelopment <br />projects, however, the change in character of the area cannot be attributed <br />solely to the existence of "adult entertainment" businesses." <br />The other approach that municipalities have followed is the dispersement <br />model, sometimes called the Detroit model. In 1972 Detroit modified an "Anti - <br />Skid Row Ordinance" to provide that subject to waiver, an adult theater could not <br />be located within 1,000 feet of any two other "regulated uses" or within 500 feet of <br />a residential area. Regulated uses applied to ten different kinds of business <br />establishments including adult theaters, adult book stores, cabarets, bars, taxi <br />dance haIIs and hotels. This statutory zoning approach to regulating adult business <br />was legally challenged and subsequently upheld by the Supreme Court as <br />" Id., at 9. <br />EVER00350 <br />