My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2005/06/15 Council Agenda Packet
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2005
>
2005/06/15 Council Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/24/2017 2:25:37 PM
Creation date
2/10/2017 11:05:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Agenda Packet
Date
6/15/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
901
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Consultants' Final Report - Page 24 <br />business addresses, but this may be expected. <br />Of course, one can argue that the relationship is noncausal or spurious; <br />that these businesses simply moved into a neighborhood that happened to already <br />have a high crime rate. We test and reject this hypothesis in the next section. For <br />now, we draw attention to the Bar/Tavern addresses in Table 2. If the alternative <br />hypothesis is that the Garden Grove Boulevard neighborhoods had high crime <br />rates before the seven adult businesses moved in, we would expect to these <br />addresses to have high crime rates as well (more so given that alcohol is served at <br />these addresses). On the contrary, however, we. find that these addresses have <br />generally lower crime rates than the adult business addresses. Whereas three of <br />seven adult business addresses are in the top ten Part I crime "hot spots," only two <br />of nine bar/tavern addresses make the top -ten list. In this sense, the seven adult <br />business addresses on Garden Grove Boulevard constitute serious, significant <br />public safety hazards. <br />EVER00370 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.