Laserfiche WebLink
Propcs�d Rctail Deve!opment J-1443 <br /> l 12`�Suect and Hwy.99 Febtuary 26,2004 <br /> � Everett,Washington Pege 9 <br /> � <br /> vaziations in groundwatcr conditions should be expected due to seasona[ vari�Hons, on and off- <br /> site land usage,irrigation, stormwatcr infillration,and other fac!ors. <br /> Scismic Criteria <br /> The City of Everett has adopted the 1997 UniForm Buiiding Codc. According to the <br /> Sersmic Zone Map of the United States contained in the 1997 Ur.iform Building Code, the projecc <br /> sitc lies within Scismic Zone 3. Based on soil conditions encountered in che borings drilled at the <br /> site,the subsurface site condirions are interpreted to correspond to a seisrrtic soil prof le type S�as <br /> defined by Table 16-J of the 1997 Unrform Buildrng Ccde. Seil profile type S� applies to an <br /> averugc soil profile within the top 100 feet consisdng predomina��tly cf very dense soil <br /> cha:acterized by Standard Penetration Test blow counts gteater than 50, a shear wave velocity of �, <br /> 1,2C0 to 2,500 feet per second,and an undraincd shear slrength greater than 2,000 psf. � <br /> � <br /> The site soils aze not considcred to be pronc to liquefaction due to their grain-size <br /> distribution and relative density. The polential for seismic relatcd settlement is considercd low. <br /> Based on our analyses, foundation bearing capacity �'ail�ae is considered unlikely, and scttlemer.t <br /> of grcuter than 1 inch is considered unlikciy during a design-level earlhquake. <br /> Results of pH and Resistivity Testine <br /> Results of the pH and resistivity testing arc presented in the foll�wing table. <br /> � <br /> TesY PitBoring Piumber Depth(Fect) pH Res(sHvity(ohm�m) <br /> TP-2, S-1 1 5.7 20,000 <br /> B-lOB, S-1 2'/z 6.4 11 000 <br /> B-20, S-1 2%z 6.0 15,000 <br /> The cicctrical resistivity of each sample listed above was measured in the laboratory witb <br /> distillcd water added to create a standardized condition of saturation. Resistivities aze at about <br /> their lowest value when the soil is sahuated. Electrical resistivities of soils aze a measure of their <br /> resistance to the flow of corrosion currenls. Corrosion currents tend to be lower in high resistivity <br /> soils. The elcctrical resistivity of the soil varies primarily with its chemical and moisture <br /> contents. Typically, the lower the resistivity of native soils,the morc likely that galvanic cua�cnts <br /> may develop and incrcase the possibility of corrosion. Based on laboratory test results, resistivity <br /> values for thc ncar surCace nafive soils varicd between 11,000 and 20,000 ohm-cm. Soils with <br /> resistivity values greater than 10,000 ohm-cm are gencrally associated with soils classified as <br /> "mildly corrosive". The pH of the soils is slightly acidic but does not appeaz to be significant in <br /> evalualing corrosivity. Therefore, it is our opinion that Type I cement is suitable for this project. <br /> With respect to tl�e nced for protection of buried metal utiliGes, we recommend that the design <br /> cngineers consult with the manufacturers of specific products in ordcr to deternvne the need for <br /> � protection. v i <br /> �.,. <br /> i <br /> J-t4A3,U:2604 <br /> i <br /> ql <br />