Laserfiche WebLink
Proposed Retail Development J-1443 <br /> 112'�Street and Hwy.99 February 26,2004 <br /> � Everett,Washington Page 18 <br /> the upper 12 inches of exposed soil Se removed and the underlying soils compacted to a minimum <br /> of 95 percent of the modified Proctor maximum dry density. T'he stripped soils co,�id then be <br /> moisture conditioned and placed as shvctural fill anywhere on site provided it is also cor.ipacted <br /> to a minimum of 95 perccnt of �he modified Proctor maximum dry density. �'or on-site soils <br /> compacted to 95 perccnt of the niodified Procror maximum dry density, �•�e have estimated a <br /> ver[ical modulus of subgrade reacdon af 200 pounds per cubic inch,based upon a correlation with <br /> the California Bearing Ratio test results. <br /> We understand tt�at the exposed conerete sl.�-on-grade floor will be 4 to SY� inches thick. <br /> The floor slab should be underlain by a layer of granular aggregate consisting of 2 inches of fine <br /> aggregate base over 4 inchcs of coarse aggregate base. We recommend that the fine aggregate <br /> base be underlain by a 6-inch thick layer of coarsc aggregate base.The Snc aggregate base should <br /> consist of confom�with the gradation requirements of ASTM D-448, grading No. 10,with 6 to 12 <br /> percent passing the U.S. No. 200 sieve while the course aggregate base should conform with the <br /> gradation requirements of ASTM D-448, grading No. 57 or No.67. <br /> With the recommended site preparation and monitoring, the differential setUcment of the <br /> floor slab constructed as recommendcd is estimated to be less than 0.9 inch in 40 feet and 0.5 inch <br /> between the exterior walls and adjacent floor slab. <br /> Drainage Considerations <br /> � A perimcter foundation drainage system is recommended around the building bccause of <br /> the occurrence of glacial till in the building pad azea. Drains arc also recommended behind all <br /> retaining walls. Aiternatively,retaining walls could be drained with weep holes on a maximum 8- <br /> foot horizontal spacing. Retaining wall drainege syslems should be slopcd to drain by gravity to a <br /> storm sewer or other suitable dischazgc location. Water &om downspouts and surfacc water <br /> should be independently collected and routed to a storm sewer. Additionally,we recommend t6at <br /> the finished grades around thc building be designed to route surface water away from the building <br /> Pinal exterior grades should promote free and positive drainage from the building azeas at <br /> all times. Water must not be allowed to pond or to collect adjacent to foundafions or within the <br /> immediate building arca. We rccommend that a gradient of at least 3 percent for a minimum <br /> distance of 10 fcet from Qie building perimeter be provided, except in paved locations. In pavai <br /> areas, a minimum gradient oF one percent should be provided unless provisions are .ncluded for <br /> collcction and disposal oFsurface water adjacent to the structure. <br /> Retainine Wall Desi� ' <br /> Walls may be dcsigned as a "restrained" retaining wall based on "at rest" earth pressure, <br /> plus any surcharge on top of the wall as described below, if the wall is attached to the building ' <br /> and movement is not acceptable. The wall could also be desi�ned based on "active" earth <br /> pressure, if the wall is not part of the building and some movement of the rctaining wall is <br /> acceptable. This movement could equa? at least 0.1 percent of the wall height. For active and at- <br /> rest earth pressures, we recommend using 35 and 55 pcf, respectively. For those portions of <br /> foundations embcdded more than 18 inches below finish sunounding grade,we rccommer,d using <br /> J-1443,022604 <br /> \$ . <br />