9830 EVERGREEN WAY BASE FILE 2018-01-01 MF Import

demonstrates that such a facility in the proposed location and at such a height is necessary to adequately senre the needs of the public for the proposed utility or communications service. (I) The Planning Director may require review by an expert tliird party. 18. Many of the Specific Evaluation criteria are addressed in the General Evaluation criteria. (exhibit 1) 19. Because the proposed antennas will be located on the pole, there is no need to build additional cellular communication towers for this particular service. (Siddiq testimony) 20. The Applicant conducted a review of potential sites for collocation. Upon its review, the Applicant determined that the best location available was the proposed one. The terrain, lack of potential collocation sites, relation to existing wireless facilities in the network, and ratio frequency were factors in determining that this is the best site. (exhibit 1, Siddiq testimony) 21. The existing pole is approximately 67 feet in height. This height does not allow the Appiicant to satisfy radio frequency requirements for a clear line of site to other facilities. With the increased height of approximately 30 feet, there will be a clear line of site established. (exhibit 1J 22. Due to the line of site technology of the application, it is not feasible or practical to require underground antennas or underground equipment: (exhibit 1) 23. The 95 foot high wood pols is the lowest heiyht possible to adequately provide for the needs of the customers and the public for the wireless service. (exhibit 1, Siddiq testimony) 24. No new tower is proposed, and the equipment shelter satisfies setback requirements of C-1 Zones. (Siddiq testimony) 2�. The Applicant submitted that it will comply with removal of the facility if the ApplicanYs use of the site is discontinued for 120 days or more. (Spencer testimnnyJ 26. The Applicant indicated that, if necessary, other facilities may collocate on-site. (Spencer testimony) 27. The proposed facility does not require safety lights by the FAA, and the Applicant must comply with all other FAA requirements for the operation of the facility. The project will not require an independent technical analysis. (exhibit 1)